State of Conservation
164
Reports
41
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Other climate change impacts |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties
Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Canada Denmark Ethiopia France Germany Ghana Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Libya Mali Mauritania Mozambique Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Pakistan Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Senegal Solomon Islands South Africa Sudan Uganda United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.