State of Conservation
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Chad China Croatia Cuba Czechia Democratic People's Republic of Korea Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Honduras India Indonesia Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia (Federated States of) Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nigeria North Macedonia Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation Saint Lucia Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka State of Palestine Thailand Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.