Huanglong Scenic and Historic Interest Area
638
China, People's Republic of
N(iii)
The Committee inscribed the central and second class conservation zones of Huanglong on the World Heritage List, excluding Mouni Gully sub-division in the west, since its condition and natural values need to be further investigated. The Committee recommended that the Chinese authorities prepare a species conservation status report in order to investigate the possibility that the site may also qualify for inscription under natural heritage criterion (iv).
The Committee recognized that the ...
Historic Centre of Prague
616
Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
C(ii)(iv)(vi)
Sites: Historic Centre of Prague
Historic Centre of Cesky Krumlov
617
Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
C(iv)
In view of the heavy tourism pressure in the town, the Committee requested the Czech & Slovak authorities to ensure that safeguards be established to mitigate any potential adverse impacts from the Sumava International Park project.
Historic Centre of Telc
621
Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
C(i)(iv)
Sites: Historic Centre of Telč
Bourges Cathedral
635
France
C(i)(iv)
Sites: Bourges Cathedral
Mines of Rammelsberg and the historic town of Goslar
623
Germany
C(iv)
Pythagoreion and Heraion of Samos
595
Greece
C(ii)(iii)
El Tajin, Pre-Hispanic City
631
Mexico
C (iii) (iv)
Sites: El Tajin, Pre-Hispanic City
Rio Abiseo National Park
548
Peru
C(iii)
The Committee already inscribed this site on the World Heritage List on the basis of natural heritage criteria in 1990. The Committee decided that this site qualified on the basis of the cultural heritage criteria (iii) as well.
Sites: Río Abiseo National Park
Old City of Zamosc
564
Poland
C(iv)
Sites: Old City of Zamość
Historic Monuments of Novgorod and surroundings
604
Russian Federation
C(ii)(iv)(vi)
16 COM X.A
Inscription: Cultural and historic ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands (Russian Federation)
Cultural and historic ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands
632
Russian Federation
C(iv)
Ban Chiang Archaeological Site
575
Thailand
C(iii)
Macquarie Island Nature Reserve
629
Australia
The Committee noted that this natural site had interesting geological value but was of the view that its characteristics were not of universal significance. However, the Committee endorsed the recommendation of IUCN that the Australian authorities consider Macquarie in the wider sense of an oceanic island ecosystem representative of the subantarctic biogeographic realm. The Committee noted that Macquarie's values might be enhanced if it was assessed in combination with some of New Zealand's neighbouring island groups and in the ...
Sites: Macquarie Island
Berezinsky Biosphere Reserve
628
Belarus
The Committee noted that this natural site is internationally recognized as one of UNESCO's Biosphere Reserves but did not meet criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List.
Cidade Velha
607
Cap Vert
The Committee noted that there was no protection or management plan for this cultural property and that it did not meet the criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List.
Tatra National Park
656
Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
The Committee acknowledged the high national importance of this natural site, but was of the view that it did not meet any natural heritage criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List. The Committee, however, encouraged the nomination of this site to UNESCO's International Network of Biosphere Reserves.
Gir Wildlife Sanctuary
615
India
The Committee noted that the conservation of this natural site will be greatly enhanced if it were included in UNESCO's International Network of Biosphere Reserves. The Committee was of the view that although it is a site of high national value, it did not meet World Heritage criteria.
Kakadu National Park
631
Australia
N(ii)(iii)(iv) C(i) (vi)
The Committee commended the Australian authorities for concluding a 10-year programme to extend this Park and for the exemplary management operation at the Park. The Committee inscribed the full extent of the Park as re-nominated by the Australian authorities on the World Heritage List. On the basis of the ICOMOS evaluation, the Committee decided to inscribe Kakadu under cultural heritage criteria (i) and (vi) instead of (i), (iii) and (vi) as in the ...
Sites: Kakadu National Park
Potsdam, Park with Sacrow Castle and Sauveur Church
532bis
Germany
C (i) (ii) (iv)
The Committee decided that the Castle and Parks of Potsdam and Berlin would be extended to include the Park with Sacrow Castle and Sauveur Church.