Tentative Lists are inventories of sites forming part of the cultural and natural heritage of a State Party, which have a strong potential to be inscribed on the World Heritage List. These national inventories are important planning tools for a number of key actors involved: the States Parties, the World Heritage Committee, the Secretariat, the Advisory Bodies. States Parties are encouraged to prepare their Tentative Lists with the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders, including site managers, local and regional governments, local communities, NGOs and other interested parties and partners, and re-examine and re-submit their Tentative List at least every ten years. Harmonization of Tentative Lists at regional and thematic levels is strongly encouraged.
According to the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Tentative Lists are important planning tools, however, most of the sites are added to Tentative Lists on an ad-hoc basis, without a real process of selection on national level and therefore do not serve their purpose. Moreover, number of States Parties are looking for a manual and/or good practice examples from other countries that have already put in place such a mechanism on national level.
In order to assist States Parties, the World Heritage Centre will compile good practice examples from States Parties having a Tentative List selection process in place and will share them in a web platform/guide available to all stakeholders.
As frequently highlighted from all actors of the Convention, the credibility of the World Heritage List and of the World Heritage system starts at the national level, with the selection of sites, which should have a strong potential for justifying OUV and their inclusion in the Tentative Lists. However, the use of Tentative Lists by States Parties in most of the cases is ineffective and not all lists contain sites that had strong potential to justify Outstanding Universal Values
An estimated overall extrabudgetary funding of USD 150,000 is needed for the implementation of this activity. These funds will cover the development of guidance and good practices, main capacity-building activities across the regions and gathering and analysing of data in view of montoring the implementation of the Policy and SDGs, as well as implementation and coordination costs.
A communication & visibility plan will be developed in consultation with the donor(s) and will include (but not limited to) the options below:
Visibility Material |
Collaterals |
Placement |
Outreach |
Target audience |
Dedicated webpage on the WH website |
Donor's logo
|
World Heritage Centre website |
● Public |
Statistics for 2018:
|
Promotional and communication campaign on social media |
Donor's logo
|
UNESCO networks: Twitter |
● Public and subscribers to UNESCO social media |
: 3,56M followers :1,257941 followers |
News and event article(s) in focus on UNESCO and World Heritage Centre website |
Donor's logo
|
World Heritage Centre's website Site: |
● Public interested in world heritage issues |
Statistics for 2016:
|
Donor's logo
|
UNESCO website : |
● Public interested in UNESCO mandate |
Statistics for June 2016 to June 2017
|
|
Side-events at the World Heritage Committee |
Donor's logo
|
World Heritage Committee - Official Launch and promotion campaign |
● Committee members |
|
Article on the Site Managers network in paper review |
Donor's Logo
|
The World Heritage Review and/or World Heritage Paper Series |
● Public |
|
Alessandro Balsamo
Programme Specialist
Nomination Team
World Heritage Centre
a.balsamo@unesco.org
For first email correspondence, please copy: wh-marketplace@unesco.org