State of Conservation (SOC)

Durmitor National Park (1993)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1981-1988)
Total Amount Ap proved: 117,000USD

1988   Contribution to the purchase of equipement for Durmitor National ...   20,000  USD
1988   Purchase of equipment to investigate the causes of the decline in ...   38,000  USD
1987   Equipment for research on forest die-back and related ...   50,000  USD
1981   2 experts missions in Durmitor National Park   9,000  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Construction of a dam on the Tara river
  • Construction of an asphalt plant and the resulting water pollution
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

The Bureau recalled that the Committee, at its last session, noted that the authorities responsible for the management of this site are of the view that the proposed construction of a hydroelectric dam on the Tara River and the pollution of the River by an asphalt dam situated upstream had minimal impacts on the conservation of Durmitor National Park. The Bureau acknowledged the fact that the Montenegro authorities had invited a UNESCO/IUCN mission to the site and that this mission should be undertaken as early as possible in order to ensure the conservation of this World Heritage site.

In view of Resolution 757 of the UN Security Council, the UNESCO World Heritage Centre is still unable to proceed with the organization of the UNESCO/IUCN mission to Durmitor National Park.

 

Conclusion
Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

No draft Decision

Durmitor National Park
State Party:
Montenegro
Date of Inscription: 1980
Nomination records (Year): 1979, 2005
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(viii)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2008
2007
2006
2005
1993
1992
1991
1985
1984
Threats*
  • Water infrastructure
  • Localised utilities
  • Surface water pollution
  • Other Threats:


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.