State of Conservation (SOC)
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1988)
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property
Requests Approved: 0
(from1979-1988)
Total Amount Ap proved: 158,850USD
| 1988 | Purchase of 2 vehicles (one tipper truck and one 4x4 pick-up) for ... | 50,000 USD |
| 1988 | Contribution to the purchase of associated spare parts for ... | 10,000 USD |
| 1987 | Purchase of a Land Rover for anti-poaching activities in ... | 17,500 USD |
| 1987 | Participation of a specialist from Ngorongoro Conservation Area ... | 4,000 USD |
| 1987 | Additional costs of equipment for Ngorongoro Conservation Area | 2,000 USD |
| 1986 | Equipment to strengthen the protection of Ngorongoro Conservation ... | 20,000 USD |
| 1980 | Additional financial assistance for the preparation of a ... | 7,000 USD |
| 1979 | Financial grant for establishment of a management plan for ... | 24,950 USD |
| 1979 | 12-month fellowship in law/administration for Ngorongoro ... | 18,000 USD |
| 1979 | Drawing up by an architect-museologist of a project for the ... | 5,400 USD |
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Shortcomings in the management
Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues
First of all, the Committee's attention is drawn to the fact that the Tanzanian authorities, by letter of 27 September 1988, have requested that the Ngorongoro Conservation Area be maintained on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
--------------------
Conditions under which this area was threatened are now greatly improved. Equipment has been made available through the World Heritage Fund and IUCN is working to strengthen policy, planning and training activities with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism.
Steps to remove the area from the Danger list have been initiated.
Conclusion
Decision
12COMX.A
Link to the decision
1) Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania)
The Committee was glad to be informed that the conservation status of this property had greatly improved but that the Tanzanian authorities had requested that it be maintained on the List of World Heritage in Danger, particularly in view of the continued threat of poaching. The Committee agreed to maintain this property on the List of World Heritage in Danger but expressed the wish that it be removed from this List in 1989.
12COMXIII.58-59
Link to the decision
58. The Committee
noted that the Bureau had examined in detail the requests presented in document SC-88/CONF.001/6 and /6.Add ;
noted that a number of modifications for certain requests had been received by the Secretariat since the document had been prepared;
also noted that the requests from Algeria, Ecuador, Sri Lanka and Zaire had already been recommended for approval by the previous Bureau at its twelfth session in June 1988.
59. In accordance with the procedures for granting international assistance set out in the Operational Guidelines adopted by the Committee (WHC/2 Revised, December 1988), the Committee approved the following requests:
A. Technical cooperation
1) Tassili N'Ajjer (Algeria)
Equipment and a financial contribution to improve visitors' services and protection of the cultural and natural heritage: $53,000
2) Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil)
Financial contribution for the inventory of the documentation on the site: $10,000
3) Talamanca-La Amistad (Costa Rica)
Equipment and financial contribution for strengthening the conservation of the Pacific sector of the site: $30,000
4) Galapagos Island (Ecuador)
Purchase of 2 boats for strengthening the protection of the site: $54,000
5) Temple of Apollo Epicurius at Bassae (Greece)
Purchase of a portable micro-earthquake monitoring system for the Temple of Apollo Epicurius at Bassae (also for use at other Greek World Heritage properties): $30,000
6) Bahla Fort (Oman)
Financial contribution to works and training for safeguarding the property: $50,000
7) Anuradhapura, Polonnaruva and Sigiraya (Sri Lanka)
Equipment for conservation and restoration of monuments (see also training below): $25,500
8) Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania)
2 vehicles (one tipper truck and one 4x4 pick-up) for constructions aimed at strengthening anti-poaching measures: $50,000
9) Durmitor National Park (Yugoslavia)
Purchase of equipment to investigate the causes of the decline in the size of population of some birds species and tree death (N.B. the Yugoslav authorities are encouraged to undertake this work as appropriate in cooperation with WMO concerning research on air pollutants. Following the work in Durmitor, all efforts should be made by the Yugoslav authorities to make the specialized equipment purchased under the Fund available for other World Heritage properties in the region. Finally, the Yugoslav authorities are requested to provide a report to the Secretariat on the use of all the research equipment provided under the Fund for this project): $38,000
10) Garamba National Park (Zaire)
2 vehicles to continue the activities of the WWF/Frankfurt Zoological Society/World Heritage consortium to combat poaching: $50,000
11) Virunga National Park (Zaire)
Equipment to improve protective measures in the Park: $40,000
TOTAL: $430,500
B. Training activities
Sri Lanka
Training component of the technical cooperation request for the cultural triangle (n°7 above): $33,500
International Course on the Technology of Stone Conservation (ICCROM)
Financial contribution to cover costs of the participation of fellows from developing countries which are States Parties to the Convention: $37,500
TOTAL: $71,000
No draft Decision
Ngorongoro Conservation Area
Tanzania, United Republic of Exports
SOC Reports (year)
20122011
2010
2009
2007
2006
2005
2004
1994
1993
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
Threats*
- Management systems/ management plan
- Financial resources
- Other Threats:
Documents
SC.88/CONF.001/04AOther Documents:
View inscribed site documents, nomination file, reports, decisions, ...SOC ID: 1577
Inscription on the Danger List
Year: 1984 -1989Threats to the Site:
Shortcomings in the management and protection of the property
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
