Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam
Factors affecting the property in 2008*
- Civil unrest
- Management systems/ management plan
- Other Threats:
Inclination of the Minaret
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
a) Political instability;
b) Inclination of the Minaret;
c) Lack of management plan.
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
- Lack of legal protection;
- Lack of an effective monuments protection agency;
- Lack of adequate protection and conservation personnel;
- Lack of a comprehensive management plan.
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
a) Increased capacity of the staff of the Afghan Ministry of Information and Culture in charge of the preservation of the property ensured;
b) Precisely identified World Heritage property and clearly marked boundaries and buffer zones;
c) Long-term stability and conservation of the Minaret of Jam ensured;
d) Site security ensured;
e) A comprehensive management system including a long-term conservation policy developed and implemented.
Corrective Measures for the property
a) Development of adequate capacity of the staff of the Ministry of Information and Culture by developing and implementing an adequate training programme in conservation and management;
b) Precise identification of the World Heritage property and clearly marked boundaries and buffer zones by:
(i) Undertaking topographic and archaeological surface surveys and re- defining core and buffer zones, as well as identifying zones affected by illicit excavations;
(ii) Marking of the core zone as "World Heritage protected area";
(iii) Officially revising the boundaries of the World Heritage property according to the results of the relevant surveys in order to complement the already identified outstanding universal value;
c) Long-term consolidation and conservation of the Minaret and the archaeological remains by:
(i) Completing the documentation and recording of the Minaret and the archaeological remains;
(ii) Undertaking soil investigation in the vicinity of the monument in order to obtain information on the cause of the inclination of the Minaret and to define the long-term consolidation measures;
(iii) Regular and systematic monitoring of the Minaret's inclination;
(iv) Establishing a full inventory of decoration including digitalization and reference system for all eight sides of the base of the Minaret;
(v) Implementing emergency restoration of the surface decoration of the Minaret;
d) Ensuring site security by:
(i) Exerting strict control of illicit excavations and protecting the site against looting, notably through hiring of an adequate number of trained site guards;
(ii) Implementing measures for enforcing the 2004 Preservation Law for Cultural and Historical Monuments;
e) Development and implementation of a management system by undertaking appropriate training for the staff of the Ministry of Information and Culture in charge of the property.
Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2008
Total amount provided to the property: USD 845,000 provided by the Government of Italy and USD 138,000 by the Government of Switzerland.
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2008
Total amount approved : 20,000 USD
2002 | Training for national and local authorities in the ... (Approved) | 20,000 USD |
Missions to the property until 2008**
No reactive monitoring mission as such, but UNESCO expert missions sent every year since 2002 in order to implement the operational project for the property, except in 2007 due to UN security restrictions.
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2008
The State Party submitted a report to the World Heritage Centre on 27 February 2008 which describes the successful implementation of the emergency work carried out in 2007 to protect the Minaret from the nearby rivers' erosion following the destruction of the protective gabions by the heavy floods in Spring 2007.
This emergency work included the construction of a wall for stabilizing the bank of the river immediately below the Minaret, was mainly financed by the State Party, with an amount of USD 200,000 from the National budget, and was co-financed under the UNESCO World Heritage Centre/Italy and Swiss Funds-in-Trust projects for Jam.
The report submitted by the State Party also mentions the needs for consolidation and conservation of the property, including archaeological activities. However, no reference is made in the report to other aspects of the Decision adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), such as the development of staff capacity, site security and a management plan, as well as possible plans for the construction of a bridge in the vicinity of the property.
Due to the current deteriorating security situation in the country, no UNESCO expert mission could be undertaken for the continuation of consolidation and conservation activities.
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies commend the State Party for the efforts and resources which have been deployed to safeguard the property in the face of extreme challenges.
Summary of the interventions
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2008
32 COM 7A.20
Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Afghanistan) (C 211 rev)
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7A,
2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007),
3. Notes the commitment of the State Party and the international community to the safeguarding of this property and urges the State Party to continue its work on the corrective measures adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007);
4. Reiterates its requests to the State Party to develop, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value including the conditions of integrity and authenticity, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;
5. Calls upon the international community, in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre, to continue its technical and financial support, in particular to implement the above corrective measures;
6. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2009, a progress report on the implementation of corrective measures, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;
7. Decides to retain the Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Afghanistan) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Draft Decision: 32 COM 7A.20
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-08/32.COM/7A,
2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007),
3. Notes the commitment of the State Party and the international community to the safeguarding of this property and urges the State Party to continue its work on the corrective measures adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007);
4. Reiterates its requests to the State Party to develop, in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, a draft Statement of outstanding universal value including the conditions of integrity and authenticity, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;
5. Calls upon the international community, in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre, to continue its technical and financial support, in particular to implement the above corrective measures;
6. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2009, a progress report on the implementation of corrective measures, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session in 2009;
7. Decides to retain the Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Afghanistan) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Exports
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.