i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

140
Reports
43
Properties concerned
33
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Ichkeul National Park (1990)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1990
Document Source: CC-90/CONF.003/3
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguaçu National Park (2010)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguaçu National Park (2008)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguaçu National Park (2007)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguaçu National Park (2006)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguazu National Park (2010)
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguazu National Park (2008)
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Iguazu National Park (2007)
States Parties: Argentina
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
K’gari (Fraser Island) (2000)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Kahuzi-Biega National Park (2004)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes
Kaziranga National Park (2009)
States Parties: India
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Financial resources
Kaziranga National Park (2008)
States Parties: India
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Insufficient infrastructure
Kaziranga National Park (2002)
States Parties: India
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Elephant-human conflicts
Kaziranga National Park (2001)
States Parties: India
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Elephant-human conflicts
Lake Baikal (2003)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2002)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2001)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2000)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Financial resources
Lake Baikal (1999)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources
Lake Baikal (1998)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Financial resources
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Central African Republic China Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Madagascar Mauritania Nepal Niger Peru Russian Federation Senegal Seychelles Solomon Islands South Africa Tunisia Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
Threats
Financial resources 140

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.