State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Thailand
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
| States Parties: |
Thailand
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors. |
| States Parties: |
Thailand
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
| States Parties: |
 Germany
|
| Year: | 2009 |
| Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Germany
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Gabon
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Gabon
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Pakistan
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Sudan
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Sudan
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Australia Austria Bahrain Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Gabon Germany Greece Guinea Haiti Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nigeria North Macedonia Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
