State of Conservation
1017
Reports
204
Properties concerned
95
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2017close
States Parties: | Mauritius |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Mauritius |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Housing |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development Housing |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Canada Chile China Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czechia Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guatemala Haiti Holy See Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Italy Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Nigeria Oman Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Senegal South Africa Spain Sri Lanka State of Palestine Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.