State of Conservation
29
Reports
13
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose
Housingclose
Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
Industrial areasclose
Region:
Africaclose
| States Parties: |
 Ethiopia
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
| States Parties: |
Ethiopia
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
 Ghana
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
| States Parties: |
Ghana
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
| States Parties: |
 Mozambique
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
| States Parties: |
Mozambique
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
| States Parties: |
Mozambique
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
| States Parties: |
Mozambique
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
| States Parties: |
Mozambique
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
| States Parties: |
Mozambique
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
| States Parties: |
 Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
| States Parties: |
 Kenya
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
Ethiopia
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| States Parties: |
 Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the fauna populations |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| States Parties: |
 Mali
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Housing |
| Other Threats: | Housing dilapidation |
| States Parties: |
Mali
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| States Parties: |
 South Africa
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| Other Threats: | a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
| States Parties: |
South Africa
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
| Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
