State of Conservation
17
Reports
17
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| brasiliaBrasilia | brazil Brazil |
2000 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
| chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Land conversion,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures |
Yes |
| chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) | peru Peru |
2000 | Financial resources,
Human resources,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other climate change impacts,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site |
No |
| city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru |
2000 | Housing, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic Dominican Republic |
2000 | Housing,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Collapse of buildings due to lack of maintenance |
No |
| earliest 16th-century monasteries on the slopes of popocatepetlEarliest 16th-Century Monasteries on the Slopes of Popocatepetl | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Earthquake, | No |
| fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
No |
| galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador |
2000 | Financial resources, Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Invasive / alien marine species, Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Commercial development, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Earthquake, Housing, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
| historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru |
2000 | Fire (widlfires),
Ground transport infrastructure,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial |
No |
| huascarán national parkHuascarán National Park | peru Peru |
2000 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Legal framework, Mining, | No |
| iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, Management systems/ management plan, Surface water pollution, | Yes |
| lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa | peru Peru |
2000 | No | |
| los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia Colombia |
2000 | Civil unrest, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Storms, | Yes |
| sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador |
2000 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
| whale sanctuary of el vizcainoWhale Sanctuary of El Vizcaino | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Marine transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Decline in sea animals populations |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
