i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

112
Reports
38
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2003close
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev
Other Threats: Fire in 2001
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent; Notorious state of degradation; Fire
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent; Notorious state of degradation
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need to improve the environment of the convent
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Civil unrest Governance Housing Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of a unique and severely degraded cultural landscape
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Fire in December 2002
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Earthquake Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Earthquake Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Mexico
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Commercial development Deliberate destruction of heritage Housing Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Management activities Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Colombia
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Other Threats: Fire in the centre of Mompox in 1998
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Flooding
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Flooding
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Avalanche/ landslide Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/9
Threats*: Avalanche/ landslide Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Uruguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.