State of Conservation
17
Reports
4
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2008close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
historic centre of mexico city and xochimilcoHistoric Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco | mexico |
2008 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
2003 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Fire in December 2002 |
No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
2000 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
1999 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
1998 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
1995 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
1994 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico |
1993 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2008 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings |
No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2007 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings |
No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2006 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2005 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2004 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2003 | Deliberate destruction of heritage, | No |
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works | chile |
2008 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out |
Yes |
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works | chile |
2007 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou |
Yes |
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works | chile |
2006 | Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.