i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Pyu Ancient Cities

Myanmar
Factors affecting the property in 2016*
  • Human resources
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Threats identified at the time of inscription of the property:
  • Lack of a conservation plan for the burial sites
  • Need to strengthen capacity-building in the conservation of these particularly fragile and vulnerable sites
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2016

Total amount provided: 1,892,032 USD from Italian Funds-In-Trust on Capacity building for safeguarding cultural heritage in Myanmar project (Phase I & II, 2011-2015), partially contributed to the property

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2016
Requests approved: 1 (from 2012-2012)
Total amount approved : 30,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2016**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2016

On 30 November 2015, the State Party submitted a full report concerning the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1444/documents/. The report provides information on the progress achieved in implementing the recommendations adopted at the time of the property’s inscription on the World Heritage List. The State Party reported that a comprehensive strategy was developed to address the World Heritage Committee's recommendations, based on the following:

  • A comprehensive inventory and conditions assessment of all burial sites at the property;
  • Technical capacity-building activities were carried out for site management staff in cooperation with Pyay Field School of Archaeology;
  • Pilot conservation activities were carried out at selected burial sites;
  • Conservation facilities at the property were upgraded;
  • Protocols for identification, excavation and conservation of archaeological remains and objects were developed;
  • The management staff was re-organised into teams with specific tasks (archaeology, conservation and research);
  • A moratorium on future excavations was declared and the preservation, documentation and interpretation of previously excavated sites were prioritized;
  • Additional technical assistance by UNESCO, through a multi-year Italian Funds-in-Trust project, is expected in 2016 to enable the authorities and experts to continue to implement the above and strengthen the overall capacity of the management body.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2016

The resolved commitment of the State Party to the conservation and management of the property should be noted; the most urgent recommendations made by the Committee at the time of inscription in 2014 have been acted upon.

The State Party has made remarkable progress with the inventory and documentation of the state of conservation of the burial sites in the property, as well as with the elaboration of a conservation programme and the associated technical capacity building activities. Several training activities have been completed, involving many staff members; guidelines and protocols have been established for the archaeological vestiges and demonstrations carried out for testing and capacity building purposes, thanks to a multi-year Italian Funds-in-Trust project (2011-2015) in partnership with UNESCO.

After having taken action upon the most urgent issues, there is a need for the State Party to sustain these efforts and to complement the Management Plan with a risk preparedness strategy, a tourism management strategy/plan to prepare for an increase in visitors, and the addition of key priorities and an action plan that addresses ways to improve the living standards of local villages, and to manage an increased numbers of pilgrims.

On 13 April 2016, a 6.9 magnitude earthquake occurred in Myanmar. The epicenter was about 149.6 to Halin site of the property. At the time of preparing this report, according to the initial assessment made by the State Party, no damage has been reported at Pyu Ancient Cities.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2016
40 COM 7B.40
Pyu Ancient Cities (Myanmar) (C 1444)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 8B.28, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Commends the State Party for the actions it has undertaken in response to the Committee's recommendations at the time of inscription to develop and implement, as soon as possible, a conservation plan for the burial sites, allied to capacity-building in the conservation of these particularly fragile and vulnerable sites;
  4. Requests the State Party in order to complement the Management Plan, to develop a risk preparedness strategy, a tourism management strategy/plan to prepare for an increase in visitors, and to add key priorities and an action plan that addresses ways to improve the living standards of local villages, and to manage an increased numbers of pilgrims;
  5. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
Draft Decision: 40 COM 7B.40

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 8B.28, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Commends the State Party for the actions it has undertaken in response to the Committee's recommendations at the time of inscription to develop and implement, as soon as possible, a conservation plan for the burial sites, allied to capacity-building in the conservation of these particularly fragile and vulnerable sites;
  4. Requests the State Party in order to complement the Management Plan, to develop a risk preparedness strategy, a tourism management strategy/plan to prepare for an increase in visitors, and to add key priorities and an action plan that addresses ways to improve the living standards of local villages, and to manage an increased numbers of pilgrims;
  5. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
Report year: 2016
Myanmar
Date of Inscription: 2014
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2015) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 40COM (2016)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.