State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Morocco
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Near total abandonment of the property |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Near total abandonment of the site |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | State of abandonment and degradation |
| States Parties: |
 Ethiopia
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern |
| States Parties: |
 Malta
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
| States Parties: |
Malta
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.) |
| States Parties: |
 France
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
France
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
France
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
France
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
France
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/2 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
France
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/4 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
 Viet Nam
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Collapsing monumentsNo participation of community |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance |
| States Parties: |
United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
| Other Threats: | General poor state of conservation |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
