i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

65
Reports
20
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Legal frameworkclose
Region: Africaclose
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Uncontrolled forest land excisions, in the Mount Hombe and Ragat blocks
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Impact of the four temporary shelters constructed in 2008; Demolition of most of the traditional “tukul” dwellings
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components;
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Major deterioration of nearly two-thirds of the earthen brick structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Grave degradation of nearly two thirds of the mud brick buildings
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Benin
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: Collapsing monumentsNo participation of community
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Legal framework
Other Threats: a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.