i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

39
Reports
16
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: China
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution
States Parties: China
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations
States Parties: China
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Unstable archaeological strata and cave roof

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.