State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2011close
Date end:2011close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| archaeological areas of pompei, herculaneum and torre annunziataArchaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata | italy Italy |
2011 | Management activities,
Other Threats: collapse of a wall |
No |
| architectural, residential and cultural complex of the radziwill family at nesvizhArchitectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh | belarus Belarus |
2011 | Management activities, | No |
| cultural and historic ensemble of the solovetsky islandsCultural and Historic Ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands | russian federation Russian Federation |
2011 | Management activities, | No |
| everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america United States of America |
2011 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Yes |
| gelati monasteryGelati Monastery | georgia Georgia |
2011 | Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments |
Yes |
| historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye Türkiye |
2011 | Management activities,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); |
No |
| historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl | russian federation Russian Federation |
2011 | Management activities, | No |
| historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta | georgia Georgia |
2011 | Management activities, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
