i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Meidan Emam, Esfahan

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Housing
  • Management activities
  • Underground transport infrastructure
  • Water infrastructure
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Commercial development (issue resolved)
  • Underground transportation infrastructure
  • Housing
  • Urban sewerage and water infrastructure
  • Disaster Risk Management (anti-earthquake structural consolidation)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

Total amount granted: 5,710 Euros (France/UNESCO Cooperation Agreement)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 2 (from 1986-2001)
Total amount approved : 13,321 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

July 2002: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; October 2002: joint World Heritage Centre/World Bank mission; June 2004 and May 2005: fact-finding missions by the UNESCO Office in Tehran; May 2006: World Heritage Centre mission; June and December 2006, April 2007, October 2008, and October 2009: Advisory missions by the UNESCO Office in Tehran; March 2010: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; May 2013: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 1 December 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, a summary of which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/115/documents. The report presents progress with several conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions, as follows:

  • The final version of the Conservation and Management Plan (CMP) in Persian for Imam Square has been prepared and approved. An English-language translation of the Plan is underway and will be submitted for review by the World Heritage Centre as soon as it is completed, as requested by the Committee;
  • The draft Disaster Risk Management Plan (DRMP) and the Preliminary Studies of Water System and Sewage System Reorganization Plan for Naqhsh-e Jahan Square, Isfahan (Imam Square), requested by the Committee, have been prepared and were attached to the report;
  • A brief paper entitled ‘Pedestrian route on Imam Square Complex’ showing the current condition of the main pedestrian access routes was enclosed in the Report.

The State Party report refers to other actions, including:

  • Ongoing conservation and restoration of the decorations of the dome of the Abbasi Grand Mosque, which was damaged in 2010;
  • Restoration and conservation of the mural paintings along the Royal route of Ali Qapo palace since 2019;
  • Continuing work on the re-installation of painted decorations at Ali Qapo mansion, along with repairs and arrangement of CCTV cameras and audio protection systems, installation of fencing around the copper pond, and construction of a restroom;
  • Ongoing installation of lighting, organisation of ramps, shop signage, security patrols, and educational and interpretative activities in the Imam Square complex;
  • Continued conservation and restoration of the second and third sections of the tile working decorations of the dome of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque;
  • Printing of tourist guide maps in English, Spanish, Arabic, and French.

The State Party also indicated that national and international visitors have been returning to the site since 2022.

On 8 August 2022, the World Heritage Centre received third-party information concerning the Shah Mosque, which was reportedly damaged during restoration works. The State Party responded on 22 October 2022, indicating the ongoing conservation process to address the damage. On 18 October 2022, the World Heritage Centre received further third-party information on a physical intervention that may have led to alterations to an entrance at the Qeyssariyeh portico and forwarded this information to the State Party for verification. At the time of writing the present document, the World Heritage Centre has not received any response from the State Party on this question.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The adoption of the Persian-language CMP, and it is recommended that the Committee note this development and request the submission of its translation.

The Disaster Risk Management Plan (DRMP) is a substantial and sophisticated document that identifies, analyses and evaluates the risks facing the property and classifies them by magnitude. This analysis can be utilised as a means of determining the priorities for action to protect against risks. A table of prioritised actions to address the assessed risks is provided, but the State Party recognizes that the DRMP is the first part of the process to address risks, and that the next part of the process is to provide measures to reduce the identified risks and be able to respond to disaster. The Committee’s previous request that the DRMP include planning for specific anti-earthquake measures is no longer appropriate, given the larger range of high risks identified in the Plan. It is therefore recommended that the Committee commend the State Party for completing this first part of the risk assessment planning and request that the next part is undertaken, and that a prioritised work plan be prepared to address the extreme and high priorities identified in the DRMP.

The Preliminary Studies of Water System and Sewage System Reorganization Plan for Naqhsh-e Jahan Square, Isfahan (Imam Square) is an exhaustive study identifying the scale of the water and sewage leak problem. This problem is caused by ageing and damaged pipes sitting over or under the fill layer of soil in which the building foundations sit, and which is underlain by a clay layer that inhibits water drainage. This results in rising damp, made worse by the presence of nitrate and sulfate ions from the sewage, which accelerates buildings’ decay. This study identifies the nature and scale of the problem and highlights that around 255 of the existing sewers had not previously been mapped, and that 16% of manhole access points were flooded, indicating downstream blockage. However, further study is now needed to map and assess the physical condition of the pipelines themselves and to facilitate the planning of repair and replacement programs. The cost, based on the current large sewer collector pipe system replacement program, is estimated to be in the order of 500 million Euros, but the State Party has not provided any prioritisation of works to address the highest risks to the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). It is therefore recommended that the Committee welcome the Water System and Sewage System Reorganization Plan and reiterate its request that the State Party submit a prioritised programme of works to implement this plan.

The three-page paper ‘Pedestrian route on Imam Square Complex’ identifies the main pedestrian routes around the property from other parts of the buffer zone. It is solely a statement of current condition and does not address the historical and cultural access issues raised in the State Party’s report in 2018. It is recommended that the Committee take note of this report and reiterate its request that the State Party submit to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, the final plan for the development of spatial structures for motorized and pedestrian access to the property. This plan should focus on resolving historical changes made to enable access for motorised vehicles, which have proven detrimental to the conservation of heritage values, and on improving pedestrian movement in and around the property.

The Committee may wish to thank the State Party for the information it provided on the works undertaken at the Emam Mosque dome, yet request the State Party to submit more information on the conservation measures, including details of the mortars being used and the structural causes of the deformation of the dome. The Committee may also wish to request information on the proposed actions to address the issues reported at the Portico of Qaysariyyeh, which could be supported by a Heritage Impact Assessment carried out in line with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context. Advice should also be added in the Conservation and Management plan to counter future potentially problematic changes to the property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.164
Meidan Emam, Esfahan (Iran (Islamic Republic of)) (C 115)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.144 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Notes the completion of the Conservation and Management Plan (CMP), and requests the State Party to submit the translated plan for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption and implementation;
  4. Commends the State Party on the completion of the first part of the Disaster Risk Management Plan (DRMP), and requests the State Party to provide information on the development of the next part of the DRMP, to prepare a detailed prioritised work plan to address the extreme and high priorities identified in the DRMP, and to submit these to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption and implementation;
  5. Welcomes the Water System and Sewage System Reorganization Plan, and reiterates its request that the State Party submit a prioritised work programme for the implementation of this plan to the World Heritage Centre as soon as possible, for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Notes the submission of a paper on pedestrian access routes, and reiterates its request that the State Party submit to the World Heritage Centre the final plan towards the development of spatial structures for motorised and pedestrian access to the property, which should focus on resolving historical alterations that enabled access and circulation for motorized vehicles and are detrimental to the conservation of heritage values, and on improving pedestrian movement in and around the property, for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Requests the State Party to provide detailed information on the conservation work for the EmamMosque dome, including the mortars being used and the structural causes of the dome’s deformation, as well as on proposed actions to address the conservation of the Portico of Qaysariyyeh, which could be supported by a Heritage Impact Assessment carried out in line with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context;
  8. Further requests the State Party to add advice in the Conservation and Management Plan to counter future problematic changes to the property;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
45 COM 8D
Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/8D,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 8D adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online 2021),
  3. Acknowledges the excellent work accomplished by States Parties in the clarification of the boundaries of their World Heritage properties and commends them for their efforts to improve the credibility of the World Heritage List;
  4. Recalls that the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are not able to examine proposals for minor or significant modifications to boundaries of World Heritage properties whenever the delimitations of such properties as inscribed remain unclear;
  5. Takes note of the clarifications of boundaries and areas provided by the States Parties for the following properties, as presented in the Annex of Document WHC/23/45.COM/8D:

AFRICA

  • Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve
  • Togo, Koutammakou, the Land of the Batammariba

ARAB STATES

  • Oman, Bahla Fort

ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

  • China, Longmen Grottoes
  • China, Old Town of Lijiang
  • China, West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of), Bam and its Cultural Landscape
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of), Meidan Emam, Esfahan
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of), Pasargadae
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of), Shahr-i Sokhta
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of), Shushtar Historical Hydraulic System
  • Japan, Historic Villages of Shirakawa-go and Gokayama
  • Viet Nam, Ha Long Bay

EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

  • Armenia, Monastery of Geghard and the Upper Azat Valley
  • Czechia, Historic Centre of Český Krumlov
  • Czechia, Historic Centre of Telč
  • Czechia, Kutná Hora: Historical Town Centre with the Church of St Barbara and the Cathedral of Our Lady at Sedlec
  • Italy, Mantua and Sabbioneta
  • Lithuania, Kernavė Archaeological Site (Cultural Reserve of Kernavė)
  • Malta, City of Valletta
  • Malta, Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum
  • Norway, Bryggen
  • Norway, West Norwegian Fjords – Geirangerfjord and Nærøyfjord
  • Sweden, Church Town of Gammelstad, Luleå
  • Sweden, Engelsberg Ironworks
  • Sweden, Hanseatic Town of Visby
  • Sweden, Rock Carvings in Tanum
  • Switzerland, Three Castles, Defensive Wall and Ramparts of the Market-Town of Bellinzona
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Blenheim Palace
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including Saint Margaret’s Church
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Saltaire
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

  • Argentina, Península Valdés
  • Chile, Sewell Mining Town;
6.    Requests the World Heritage Centre to continue the identification and collection of geographic and cartographic information of World Heritage properties in nominations where the required information is not available or not adequate;

7.    Also requests the States Parties which have not yet answered the questions raised in the framework of the Retrospective Inventory, to provide all clarifications and documentation as soon as possible, and by 1 December 2023, for their subsequent examination, if the technical requirements are met, by the 46th session of the World Heritage Committee.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.164

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.144 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Notes the completion of the Conservation and Management Plan (CMP), and requests the State Party to submit the translated plan for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption and implementation;
  4. Commends the State Party on the completion of the first part of the Disaster Risk Management Plan (DRMP), and requests the State Party to provide information on the development of the next part of the DRMP, to prepare a detailed prioritised work plan to address the extreme and high priorities identified in the DRMP, and to submit these to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies prior to its adoption and implementation;
  5. Welcomes the Water System and Sewage System Reorganization Plan, and reiterates its request that the State Party submit a prioritised work programme for the implementation of this plan to the World Heritage Centre as soon as possible, for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Notes the submission of a paper on pedestrian access routes, and reiterates its request that the State Party submit to the World Heritage Centre the final plan towards the development of spatial structures for motorised and pedestrian access to the property, which should focus on resolving historical alterations that enabled access and circulation for motorized vehicles and are detrimental to the conservation of heritage values, and on improving pedestrian movement in and around the property, for review by the Centre and the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Requests the State Party to provide detailed information on the conservation work for the Emam Mosque dome, including the mortars being used and the structural causes of the dome’s deformation, as well as on proposed actions to address the conservation of the Portico of Qaysariyyeh, which could be supported by a Heritage Impact Assessment carried out in line with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context;
  8. Further requests the State Party to add advice in the Conservation and Management Plan to counter future problematic changes to the property;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Report year: 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Date of Inscription: 1979
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(v)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.