State of Conservation
174
Reports
39
Properties concerned
29
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2006close
| States Parties: |
 Seychelles
|
| Year: | 1986 |
| Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
| Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations |
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Romania
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
Spain
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon Canada Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Mauritania Mexico Nepal New Zealand Oman Panama Peru Romania Russian Federation Senegal Seychelles Spain United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
