i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

33
Reports
11
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Other climate change impactsclose
States Parties: France
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Nothofagus dieback
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Canada United States of America
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.6,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.