State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the outstanding universal value of the property |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Essential management activities such as the removal of invasive alien species and controlled burning cannot be carried out as required |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Central African Republic China Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Germany Ghana Guinea Haiti Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Italy Kenya Kiribati Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Lithuania Madagascar Mali Mauritania Mexico Mozambique Nepal Niger Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Seychelles Solomon Islands South Africa Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Financial resources 298
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.