i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property: Chavin (Archaeological Site)close
Date Start: 2002close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2013)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2013
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2009)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2007)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: destabilisation of one of the main structures
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2006)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Growth of native vegetation (Pinkuyo), the roots of which destabilize the foundations
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2005)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2004)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2003)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2002)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Peru
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 8

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.