i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 1999close
Date end:1999close
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
białowieża forestBiałowieża Forest belarus,poland Belarus
Poland		 1999 Forestry /wood production, Management systems/ management plan, No
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks canada Canada 1999 Mining, No
donana national parkDoñana National Park spain Spain 1999 Mining, Surface water pollution, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1999 Crop production, Housing, Industrial areas, Storms, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, Yes
gough and inaccessible islandsGough and Inaccessible Islands united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1999 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Illegal activities, Invasive/alien terrestrial species, Management systems/ management plan, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 1999 Financial resources, Forestry /wood production, Surface water pollution, No
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 1999 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Surface water pollution, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 1999 Forestry /wood production, Ground transport infrastructure, Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Invasive / alien freshwater species, Oil and gas, Renewable energy facilities, Surface water pollution,
Other Threats: Infection threat to bison population
 Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.