State of Conservation
65
Reports
27
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:1989close
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.004/5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5 |
Threats*: | Localised utilities |
Other Threats: | 50% of the bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5 |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1988 |
Document Source: | SC-88/CONF.001/13 |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties
Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea Honduras India Montenegro Nepal New Zealand Peru Senegal Seychelles Tunisia United Republic of Tanzania United States of America ZimbabweThreats
Illegal activities 26 Water infrastructure 17 Management systems/ management plan 15 Ground transport infrastructure 11 Water (rain/water table) 11 Mining 8 Crop production 6 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 6 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 5 Financial resources 5 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 4 Air pollution 4 Subsistence hunting 4 Housing 3 Land conversion 3 Oil and gas 3 Civil unrest 3 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 2 Industrial areas 1 Air transport infrastructure 1 Localised utilities 1 Surface water pollution 1 Legal framework 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.