State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 China
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Many buildings in a bad state of conservation |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Conflicts between the management and local people |
| States Parties: |
 Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1986 |
| Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Bulgaria
|
| Year: | 1985 |
| Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Croatia
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Croatia
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Croatia
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.14,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Neglected Park infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Growing energy demands of the tourist industry |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 1993 |
| Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 United Republic of Tanzania
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
China
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Cuba
|
| Year: | 1993 |
| Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Italy
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.003/12 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Italy
|
| Year: | 1989 |
| Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.004/12 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
China
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 Türkiye
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
Türkiye
|
| Year: | 1991 |
| Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| States Parties: |
 United States of America
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
United States of America
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
| Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
| Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
| Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Bulgaria China Croatia Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala India Indonesia Italy Mauritania Montenegro Nepal Pakistan Peru Spain Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
