i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

228
Reports
47
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Africaclose
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Delay in implementing rehabilitation of the San Sebastian Fortressb) Buildings threatened with collapse
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Buildings threatened with collapse
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Buildings threatened with collapse
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: f) Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants;
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants;
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Hazardous condition of the buildingsb) Integrity of the propert
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Buildings threatened with collapse
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Zimbabwe
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.