i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

10
Reports
4
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1997close
Threats* : Stormsclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1997 Storms, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1996 Storms, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1995 Storms, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1994 Storms, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1993 Storms, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1992 Storms, No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 1995 Storms,
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple
 No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 1994 Storms,
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.)
 No
monastery of batalhaMonastery of Batalha portugal Portugal 1990 Storms,
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
 No
monastery of the hieronymites and tower of belem in lisbonMonastery of the Hieronymites and Tower of Belém in Lisbon portugal Portugal 1990 Storms,
Other Threats: Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.