Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








268 Decisions
12 Resolutions
Year start: 2009
Year end: 2009
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7A.19 and 32 COM 7A.19, adopted respectively at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions; 3. Takes notes of the progress that has been made in generating political support and commitment to the conservation of Zabid and the increase in resources for the General Organization for the Preservation of Historic Cities in Yemen (GOPHCY), supplemented by the socio-economic development project of the German Technical Assistance (GTZ), the Yemeni Government and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the report provided by the State Party on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session; 4. Notes the State Party's efforts and resources deployed to safeguard the property in extremely difficult circumstances and the commitment of the international community in reaching the desired state of conservation for this property; 5. Reiterates its request ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.21, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the report provided by the State Party on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session; 4. Notes the efforts and commitment of the State Party and the international community for the safeguarding of this property and urges the State Party to continue its work on the corrective measures, particularly the completion of the management plan for the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.22, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Warmly congratulates the State Party for its commitment and efforts in reaching the desired state of conservation and thanks the international community for its support; 4. Recognizes the efforts of the State Party in continuing its work on the corrective measures adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007); 5. Requests the State Party to clarify the status of the legal adoption of the comprehensive management ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.23, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the State Party in the overall preservation and conservation of elements of the World Heritage property, notably by adopting the master plans and carrying out conservation works at the two sites of the Lahore Fort and Shalamar Gardens; 4. Notes however that some of the corrective measures agreed by the World Heritage Committee remain to be implemented, in order to achieve the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7A.11 and 32 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively, 3. Notes with satisfaction and congratulates the State Party for the significant progress achieved in the implementation of the corrective measures towards the removal of the property from the World Heritage List in Danger, particularly the inclusive and community-based nature of actions implemented, and the efforts made in the valorisation and transmission of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Warmly welcomes the State Party's efforts to improve the state of conservation of the property and the significant progress made in the implementation of the corrective measures for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Notes that the State Party developed a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session in 2010; 5. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 30 COM 7B.77, 31 COM 7A.27 and 32 COM 7A.26, adopted at its 30th (Vilnius, 2006), 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively, and in particular its concern that the construction project of the Waldschlösschen Bridge would irreversibly damage the Outstanding Universal Value and integrity of the property in accordance with Paragraph 179 (b) of the Operational Guidelines, 3. Also recalling the report provided by the reinforced monitoring mission of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Decides to adjourn debate on this agenda item until its next ordinary session, it being understood that the report and Decision presented at the present 33rd session will continue to be before the Committee for debate at its next ordinary session, as indicated in documents: WHC-09/33.COM/7A, Paris, 11 May 2009; WHC-09/33.COM/7A Add, Paris, 29 May 2009; WHC-09/33.COM/7A Corr, Seville, 23 June 2009.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.28 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes the progress made in implementing the Priority Interventions Programme; 4. Requests the State Party to finalize the assessment phase and to begin interventions on buildings at risk and to secure the required resources for effective implementation, to revise the management plan and to finalise the definition of regulatory measures for the buffer zone; 5. Invites the State Party to consider another request for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.29, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes with satisfaction and appreciates the significant progress made in the implementation of corrective measures within the timeframe for implementation, particularly in regard to the implementation of the management plan; 4. Takes note that the State Party has developed a proposal for the desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger and urges the State Party to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.30, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the progress made on the implementation of the corrective measures, as requested by the World Heritage Committee; 4. Also regrets that the State Party did not submit a Statement of Outstanding Universal Value and reiterates its request to develop it in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 5. Urges the State Party to continue its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7A.31, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not yet proposed a new date for the high level meeting requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007) and urges the State Party to set a date for this meeting as soon as possible in consultation with the Office of the Director General of UNESCO, the Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee and the President of IUCN; 4. Welcomes the continued commitment ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.5, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3. Regrets that, in its report, the State Party did not consider a number of the threats to the property that have been noted in previous decisions; 4. Expresses its concern that mining activities are progressing near the property and its buffer zone, in advance of consideration of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA); 5. Urges the State Party to ensure that the operations of the mining concessions ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.6, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3. Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in addressing threats and management issues in the property, in particular; efforts to involve local communities in the management of the property and the development of income- generating activities within the property as well as the development of a regular ecological monitoring plan to monitor the values and integrity of the property ; 4. Notes with satisfaction the results ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.1 adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session; 4. Notes with satisfaction the findings of the mission that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property is intact and that the effectiveness of its management is considered to be at its highest level since the inscription of the property on the World ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.7, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3. Notes the on-going efforts of the State Party to restore the functioning of the wetlands to support birdlife, to improve the overall management of the property and to involve local communities in the management of the property; 4. Also notes the importance of specific monitoring on the state of conservation of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; and requests the State Party to take this into account in its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.5, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the report of the State Party, including the noted progress and the assessment of the significant challenges facing the property, notably in relation to protection and effective management of its values, governance and the relationship with private landowners, and wider threats from illegal development and water pollution; 4. Regrets that extensive illegal developments have taken place and have had a negative ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.8, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3. Welcomes the efforts of the State Party to improve connectivity amongst the different components of the property, as well as its intention to prepare an extension for the property; 4. Notes the reported progress towards the establishment of an overall management board for the property as well as efforts to increase financial resources for the control of invasive species and address the impacts of wildfires in the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.9, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), 3. Notes with satisfaction the progress made by the State Party in addressing threats and management issues in the property; 4. Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts to establish a sustainable financing strategy for the property and calls on the international donor community to continue its support for the management of the property; 5. Urges the State Party to take the necessary steps to ensure that all licences ...