State of Conservation
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
city of quitoCity of Quito | ecuador |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
island of goreeIsland of Gorée | senegal |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Dilapidated state of some buildings |
No |
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park | argentina |
1986 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park | argentina |
1985 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1989 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
1989 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
1988 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador |
1989 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.