i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 1993close
Date end:1993close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
air and tenere natural reservesAir and Ténéré Natural Reserves niger Niger 1993 War, Yes
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park nepal Nepal 1993 Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
danube deltaDanube Delta romania Romania 1993 Legal framework, No
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park montenegro Montenegro 1993 Localised utilities, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 1993 Crop production, Housing, Industrial areas, Storms, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, No
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park argentina Argentina 1993 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, No
kluane / wrangell-st. elias / glacier bay / tatshenshini-alsekKluane / Wrangell-St. Elias / Glacier Bay / Tatshenshini-Alsek canada,united states of america Canada
United States of America		 1993 Management systems/ management plan, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1993 Civil unrest, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures;
Yes
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 1993 Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls zambia,zimbabwe Zambia
Zimbabwe		 1993 Water infrastructure, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1993 Financial resources, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, Yes
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1993 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park croatia Croatia 1993 Illegal activities, War, Yes
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1993 Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Yes
sinharaja forest reserveSinharaja Forest Reserve sri lanka Sri Lanka 1993 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need to implement the Management Plan as a priority
 No
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 1993 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Surface water pollution, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 1993 Ground transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, No
te wahipounamu – south west new zealandTe Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand new zealand New Zealand 1993 Major linear utilities, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure, No
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1993 Civil unrest, Financial resources, Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Mining, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.