i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

107
Reports
44
Properties concerned
34
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: China
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: France
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Cyprus
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Turkmenistan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.