State of Conservation
107
Reports
44
Properties concerned
34
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Paraguay |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Argentina Brazil |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Cyprus |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Belgium Benin Brazil Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Indonesia Ireland Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Mali Malta Morocco Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.