State of Conservation
146
Reports
34
Properties concerned
30
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2011close
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
States Parties
Argentina Australia Belarus Brazil Bulgaria China Croatia Denmark Dominica Ecuador France India Indonesia Italy Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Nepal Peru Poland Portugal Russian Federation South Africa Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.