State of Conservation
28
Reports
28
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2009close
Date end:2009close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis | egypt |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
bordeaux, port of the moonBordeaux, Port of the Moon | france |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto | italy |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments | viet nam |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
dresden elbe valleyDresden Elbe Valley | germany |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented |
No |
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg | austria |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic centre of viennaHistoric Centre of Vienna | austria |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara | japan |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
kaziranga national parkKaziranga National Park | india |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor | montenegro |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
qal’at al-bahrain – ancient harbour and capital of dilmunQal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour and Capital of Dilmun | bahrain |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
rock drawings in valcamonicaRock Drawings in Valcamonica | italy |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures | uzbekistan |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
san agustin archaeological parkSan Agustín Archaeological Park | colombia |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: State of conservation of the fabric of monolithic sculpture |
No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang | lao people's democratic republic |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley | germany |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
vredefort domeVredefort Dome | south africa |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation |
2009 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.