State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Need to preserve the landscape |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Belize Benin Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guatemala Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation Saint Lucia Senegal Slovenia South Africa Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.