i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Human resourcesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
 No
ashur (qal'at sherqat)Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) iraq Iraq 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance
 Yes
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2004 Human resources, Yes
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
historic district of old quebecHistoric District of Old Québec canada Canada 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: Risk of fire
 No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors
 Yes
robben islandRobben Island south africa South Africa 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire
No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2004 Human resources,
Other Threats: State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures
 Yes
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2004 Human resources, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.