State of Conservation
30
Reports
30
Properties concerned
39
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2013close
Date end:2013close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Reduction of elephant population |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Signage; Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties
Albania Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon China Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo France Germany Guinea Honduras Indonesia Italy Kenya Malawi Mauritania Niger North Macedonia Panama Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Switzerland Thailand Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.