State of Conservation
7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2006close
Date end:2006close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata | mauritania Mauritania | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis | egypt Egypt | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt Egypt | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
No |
m'zab valleyM'Zab Valley | algeria Algeria | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the environment |
No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument |
Yes |
old towns of djenneOld Towns of Djenné | mali Mali | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Housing dilapidation |
No |
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2006 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: a) Collapsing monumentsb) No participation of communit |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.