State of Conservation
22
Reports
4
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2004close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
gunung mulu national parkGunung Mulu National Park | malaysia |
2002 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of inclusion of indigenous peoples and their claims in the decision to extend the Park |
No |
gunung mulu national parkGunung Mulu National Park | malaysia |
2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Lack of inclusion of indigenous peoples and their claims in the decision to extend the Park |
No |
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago | viet nam |
2004 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
komodo national parkKomodo National Park | indonesia |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
komodo national parkKomodo National Park | indonesia |
1999 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
komodo national parkKomodo National Park | indonesia |
1997 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
komodo national parkKomodo National Park | indonesia |
1996 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
2003 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
2002 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
2001 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1999 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1998 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1997 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1996 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1995 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1994 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1993 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures; |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1992 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1991 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1990 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india |
1989 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.