State of Conservation
252
Reports
34
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2021close
Themes:
Marine & coastalclose
| States Parties: |
 Philippines
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources Illegal activities |
| States Parties: |
Philippines
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources Illegal activities |
| States Parties: |
Philippines
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Fishing/collecting aquatic resources |
| States Parties: |
Philippines
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Philippines
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Illegal activities Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Philippines
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| States Parties: |
 Mexico
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline in sea animals populations |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.6 |
| Threats*: | Localised utilities Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline in sea animals populations |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Localised utilities Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline in sea animals populations |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Localised utilities Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Localised utilities Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Mexico
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Localised utilities Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh Belize Canada Costa Rica Ecuador France India Indonesia Japan Kiribati Mauritania Mexico Panama Philippines Russian Federation Seychelles Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Sudan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Viet Nam YemenThreats
Management systems/ management plan 119 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources 80 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 70 Illegal activities 59 Housing 52 Storms 48 Oil and gas 42 Marine transport infrastructure 41 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 40 Invasive/alien terrestrial species 38 Financial resources 37 Legal framework 36 Surface water pollution 34 Water infrastructure 32 Mining 32 Ground transport infrastructure 31 Invasive / alien marine species 29 Human resources 28 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 24 Land conversion 20 Industrial areas 19 Ground water pollution 19 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 19 Changes to oceanic waters 17 Crop production 16 Forestry /wood production 16 Governance 16 Non-renewable energy facilities 14 Commercial hunting 13 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure 11 Management activities 11 Localised utilities 10 Other climate change impacts 10 Renewable energy facilities 9 Solid waste 8 Civil unrest 8 Invasive / alien freshwater species 8 Temperature change 7 Fire (widlfires) 6 Pollution of marine waters 4 Water (extraction) 4 Aquaculture 3 Subsistence hunting 3 Hyper-abundant species 3 Commercial development 1 Air transport infrastructure 1 Erosion and siltation/ deposition 1 Translocated species 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
