i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

45
Reports
25
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1986close
Taï National Park (1984)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC/84/CONF.004/9
Threats*: Crop production Illegal activities Mining
Tasmanian Wilderness (1984)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC/84/CONF.004/7,SC/84/CONF.004/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Tasmanian Wilderness (1983)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC/83/CONF.009/INF.5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Wieliczka and Bochnia Royal Salt Mines (1984)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC/84/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Relative humidity Water (rain/water table)
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration
Wood Buffalo National Park (1985)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Australia Benin Bulgaria Canada Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea India Montenegro Poland Senegal Seychelles Tunisia United Republic of Tanzania Zimbabwe
Threats
Water infrastructure 14 Management systems/ management plan 12 Illegal activities 11 Water (rain/water table) 8 Mining 5 Ground transport infrastructure 4 Financial resources 4 Housing 3 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 3 Crop production 3 Air pollution 2 Land conversion 2 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 2 Subsistence hunting 2 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 2 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 2 Civil unrest 2 Air transport infrastructure 1 Surface water pollution 1 Relative humidity 1 Deliberate destruction of heritage 1 Storms 1 Earthquake 1 Legal framework 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.