i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Deliberate destruction of heritageclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
angkorAngkor cambodia Cambodia 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees
 No
city of graz – historic centre and schloss eggenbergCity of Graz – Historic Centre and Schloss Eggenberg austria Austria 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the civil architecture
No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley nepal Nepal 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Fire
 Yes
ksar of ait-ben-haddouKsar of Ait-Ben-Haddou morocco Morocco 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: State of abandonment and degradation
 No
mahabodhi temple complex at bodh gayaMahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya india India 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
medina of fezMedina of Fez morocco Morocco 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
megalithic temples of maltaMegalithic Temples of Malta malta Malta 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
rock art of altaRock Art of Alta norway Norway 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
walled city of baku with the shirvanshah's palace and maiden towerWalled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower azerbaijan Azerbaijan 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.