State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| brasiliaBrasilia | brazil Brazil |
2000 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
| chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone | peru Peru |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Land conversion,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures |
Yes |
| chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) | peru Peru |
2000 | Financial resources,
Human resources,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other climate change impacts,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site |
No |
| city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco | peru Peru |
2000 | Housing, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic Dominican Republic |
2000 | Housing,
Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Collapse of buildings due to lack of maintenance |
No |
| earliest 16th-century monasteries on the slopes of popocatepetlEarliest 16th-Century Monasteries on the Slopes of Popocatepetl | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Earthquake, | No |
| fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama Panama |
2000 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: More attention to be paid to stone conservation |
No |
| historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico Mexico |
2000 | Commercial development, Deliberate destruction of heritage, Earthquake, Housing, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
| lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa | peru Peru |
2000 | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
