Osun-Osogbo Sacred Grove
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
- Fire (widlfires)
- Ground transport infrastructure
- Housing
- Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
- Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
- Surface water pollution
- Other Threats:
Fragility of spiritual, symbolic and ritual qualities of the Grove in the face of a growth in visitor numbers; Inappropriate restoration and reconstruction
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
- Urban development close to the property
- Road construction around the property
- Pollution of the Osun River
- Bush fires within the property
- Adverse impact of the commercialisation of the annual festival
- Fragility of spiritual, symbolic and ritual qualities of the Grove in the face of a growth in visitor numbers and the lack of a tourism management plan
- Road through property not re-aligned
- Inappropriate restoration and reconstruction
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024
In 2020: USD 49,620 from the UNESCO / Netherlands Funds-in-Trust for the Development of a Conservation Methodology, training, digital documentation and review of the Conservation Management Plan
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Total amount approved : 10,000 USD
1999 | Preparation of 2 nomination files: Ekhor (Benin) & Osun ... (Approved) | 10,000 USD |
Missions to the property until 2024**
October 2015: ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; August 2023: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024
A joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission visited the property in August 2023 (mission report available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1118/documents/).
On 22 February 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1118/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented in this report, as follows:
- The National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM), the Osun State Government, the Ataoja-in-Council, the Adunni Olorisa Trust Foundation (AOTF) and relevant stakeholders collaborate on the management of the property;
- Following on from the recent digital documentation of the shrines, the AOTF and the NCMM are documenting material maintenance and repairs;
- Discussions continue on the agreement with the Ataoja of Osogbo to share revenue from the annual Osun festival for the conservation of the property;
- Discussions continue on the diversion of the current road to the outskirts of the property based on a letter of commitment from the Osun State Government;
- The Osun River is not polluted, in part due to the efforts of the management stakeholders. New water tests have been commissioned and water-safety campaigns continue. Federal ministries have undertaken action to stop illegal gold mining in the region;
- The failure to report the collapse of the Busanyin Shrine was an oversight. Digital documentation of the shrine and a Flood Mitigation Masterplan have been compiled through support of the United States Ambassadors Fund and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre. Interim flood mitigation measures are in place;
- The fragile property is now managed through a Conservation Management Plan (CMP). The State Party notes that no extreme threats currently exist;
- During the 2023 Reactive Monitoring mission, it was established that cement was a primary material used by Austrian artist Susanne Wenger in her processes. Her methods were transferred to the New Sacred Artists, who are integral to conservation and maintenance works. Consequently, the sculptures and shrines retain their authenticity. A Conservation Strategy, which is being funded by the Kingdom of the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust, will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre;
- The review and updating of the CMP are on hold pending the report of the 2023 Reactive Monitoring mission.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024
The State Party’s willingness to proceed with updating the CMP and compiling a Conservation Strategy is welcome.
The 2023 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission reports that the state of conservation is relatively good overall. It notes that progress has been made in addressing pollution, decay, and riverbank erosion, but identified challenges persist, particularly concerning the conservation of the sacred 20th century artworks. As noted in previous reports, cement was the original material used in the creation of the sculptures by Austrian artist Susanne Wenger. However, cement is susceptible to cracking and water ingress, leading to corrosion of the internal steel reinforcements. The 2023 mission recommends that conservation of the sculptures, including small repairs, should take preference over reconstruction. As previously reported, reconstructive processes are of considerable concern in relation to the authenticity of the property as multiple recreations over time will not support authenticity and must be avoided. The need for future reconstruction can be reduced through the application of alternative conservation processes and materials. Accurate and detailed inventories are also needed of all the 20th century artworks setting out their forms at the time of inscription and any changes since. The draft updated CMP should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.
At the time of inscription, the ecological restoration of the primary forest, parts of which are included in the buffer zone, was identified as a primary management goal. The 2023 mission notes that since then, approximately 28% of the buffer zone has been converted through encroachment, and no clear delineation maps of the property are available to the management. A car park is now planned in the buffer zone. The 2023 mission recommends for a review to be undertaken to assess past measures aimed at ecological restoration, and to implement measures to reverse encroachments and reductions of the primary forest since the time of inscription.
The reported collaboration between stakeholders in the management of the property is essential to ensure the maintenance of its OUV. The discussions to share revenue from the annual Osun festival for the conservation of the property (previously reported in 2023) and relocate the road out of the property are important. The road relocation was foreseen in the Management Plan at the time of inscription and the Committee then requested that the State Party provide information, as soon as possible, on the closure of the tarmac road. The State Party should urgently continue with its discussions and submit to the World Heritage Centre the details of the alignment of the proposed road, the design of the bridge and plans for downgrading the existing road before their implementation.
The State Party report that the Osun River is not polluted is welcome, as this water is used by worshippers. However, the 2023 mission reported that pollution remains a source of concern. As no details of past water tests are provided, it is unclear if the continued water-safety campaigns are sufficient to ensure that worshippers are not at risk. In its 2021 state of conservation report, the State Party noted that the Osun State had agreed to carry out regular sampling of water in the Osun River. The 2023 mission highlights that testing needs to be undertaken on a regular basis. Sharing the outcomes of past and new tests will allow for the analysis of trends in water quality.
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7B.23
Osun-Osogbo Sacred Grove (Nigeria) (C 1118)
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3,
- Recalling Decisions 44 COM 7B.9 and 45 COM 7B.129 adopted at its extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
- Notes the recommendations presented by the 2023 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission, and requests that the State Party implement these recommendations in combination with previous Committee decisions and the recommendations of the 2015 ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission;
- Also notes that the process to revise the Conservation Management Plan (CMP) was delayed by the extended timeline for the completion of the 2023 Reactive Monitoring mission report and that the former Conservation Strategy remains in force, and requests that the State Party submit the updated CMP to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
- Expresses its concern at the reports of encroachment into the buffer zone of the property and encourages the State Party to:
- Prepare detailed maps of the property and its buffer zone for use in the management of the property,
- Clearly demarcate the boundaries of the property and its buffer zone in the physical landscape;
- Also recalling that the ecological restoration of the primary forest of the property was identified as a principal management goal at the time of inscription and also encourages the State Party to:
- Review past measures for the ecological restoration of the primary forest as part of the process of the revision of the CMP,
- Implement measures to reverse encroachment into the buffer zone and reduction in the primary forest since the time of inscription;
- Welcomes the State Party’s report that the Osun River is not polluted, that action against illegal mining in the region is ongoing, that clean-up actions have been undertaken and that further water quality tests will be undertaken and, also requests that testing be undertaken on a regular basis, and that the outcomes of past and future tests be shared with the World Heritage Centre;
- Further notes the ongoing discussions regarding the allocation of funding from the annual festival for the conservation of the property and the relocation of the tarmac road from the property and further encourages the State Party to proceed with these discussions with urgency and with the ambition to report to their successful conclusion in its next state of conservation report and to submit details of the alignment of the proposed road, the design of the bridge and plans for downgrading the existing road with the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before entering into contracts for their implementation;
- Also welcomes the documentation process of material maintenance and repairs, considers that reconstruction of sculptures created by Susanne Wenger undermines the authenticity of the property, and reiterates its request to refrain from carrying out any non-urgent work on restoration of the sculptures and to halt all reconstruction until a revised conservation methodology and phased conservation plan has been prepared and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
- Further welcomes the development of a Conservation Strategy of the sculptural elements of the property, funded through the Kingdom of the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust, and further requests that the Conservation Strategy:
- Aims to maintain the authenticity of the sculptures of Austrian artist Susanne Wenger over time by giving preference to the application of appropriate conservation methods and materials that halt or slow down processes of decay to avoid replication or reconstruction,
- Includes a detailed inventory of all the 20th century sculptures that sets out their form at the time of inscription and any changes since,
- Be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any further work is undertaken;
- Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7B.23
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.3,
- Recalling Decisions 44 COM 7B.9 and 45 COM 7B.129, adopted at its extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
- Notes the recommendations presented by the 2023 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission, and requests that the State Party implement these recommendations in combination with previous Committee decisions and the recommendations of the 2015 ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission;
- Also notes that the process to revise the Conservation Management Plan (CMP) was delayed by the extended timeline for the completion of the 2023 Reactive Monitoring mission report and that the former Conservation Strategy remains in force, and requests that the State Party submit the updated CMP to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
- Expresses its concern at the reports of encroachment into the buffer zone of the property and encourages the State Party to:
- Prepare detailed maps of the property and its buffer zone for use in the management of the property,
- Clearly demarcate the boundaries of the property and its buffer zone in the physical landscape;
- Also recalling that the ecological restoration of the primary forest of the property was identified as a principal management goal at the time of inscription and also encourages the State Party to:
- Review past measures for the ecological restoration of the primary forest as part of the process of the revision of the CMP,
- Implement measures to reverse encroachment into the buffer zone and reduction in the primary forest since the time of inscription;
- Welcomes the State Party’s report that the Osun River is not polluted, that action against illegal mining in the region is ongoing, that clean-up actions have been undertaken and that further water quality tests will be undertaken and, also requests that testing be undertaken on a regular basis, and that the outcomes of past and future tests be shared with the World Heritage Centre;
- Further notes the ongoing discussions regarding the allocation of funding from the annual festival for the conservation of the property and the relocation of the tarmac road from the property and further encourages the State Party to proceed with these discussions with urgency and with the ambition to report to their successful conclusion in its next state of conservation report and to submit details of the alignment of the proposed road, the design of the bridge and plans for downgrading the existing road with the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before entering into contracts for their implementation;
- Also welcomes the documentation process of material maintenance and repairs, considers that reconstruction of sculptures created by Susanne Wenger undermines the authenticity of the property, reiterates its request to refrain from carrying out any non-urgent work on restoration of the sculptures and to halt all reconstruction until a revised conservation methodology and phased conservation plan has been prepared and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
- Further welcomes the development of a Conservation Strategy of the sculptural elements of the property, funded through the Kingdom of the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust, further requests that the Conservation Strategy:
- Aims to maintain the authenticity of the sculptures of Austrian artist Susanne Wenger over time by giving preference to the application of appropriate conservation methods and materials that halt or slow down processes of decay to avoid replication or reconstruction,
- Includes a detailed inventory of all the 20th century sculptures that sets out their form at the time of inscription and any changes since,
- Be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any further work is undertaken;
- Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Exports
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.