State of Conservation
67
Reports
24
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2008close
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Delay in implementing rehabilitation of the San Sebastian Fortressb) Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Buildings threatened with collapse |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Conflict between the construction of new properties and the restoration of existing buildings |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built area b) Continuous collapse of buildingsc) Major deterioration of the maritime part of the fortifications of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Continuous collapse of the buildings; c) Advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | a) Progressive deterioration of the built framework; b) Absence of a rehabilitation policy for the Mellah Quarter; c) Continuous collapse of the buildings and advanced deterioration of the maritime part of the fortified wall of the Medina |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Solid waste |
Other Threats: | The general state of conservation of the property is a cause for concern |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.