Nombre d'États parties présents et votant                       25

Nombre de bulletins valables                                            25

France                                                                                25 voix

Iran                                                                                     23 voix

Nigéria                                                                               23 voix

Tunisie                                                                                23 voix

États Unis                                                                           23 voix

Egypte                                                                                22 voix

Equateur                                                                            21 voix

Yougoslavie                                                                        19 voix

Australie                                                                             18 voix

Canada                                                                               17 voix

République fédérale d'Allemagne                                     17 voix

Ghana                                                                                 17 voix

Pologne                                                                              17 voix

Sénégal                                                                              17 voix

Iraq                                                                                     15 voix

Jordanie                                                                             14 voix

Suisse                                                                                 14 voix

(a) a brochure in five UNESCO languages (Arabic, English, French,Russian and Spanish) aimed primarily at opinion-makers in States not yet adhering to the Convention, to describe the objectives of the Convention, the criteria for nominations to the World Heritage List, the types of assistance available and the ways of applying for such assistance;

(b) a simple, four-panel leaflet on the Convention and its objectives in all five UNESCO languages for distribution to the general public everywhere on a large scale, to answer inquiries; and

(c) a World Heritage poster.

Item of expenditure / Funds authorized

I. Preparatory Assistance

Preparation of nominations to the World Heritage List and(or) preparation of requests and feasibility studies for technical cooperation projects (provision of experts, equipment or financial grants required for the work foreseen under this item), as provided for
in Articles 13.2 and 21.3 of the Convention / $140.000

II. Technical cooperation

Training (fellowships) for nationals of States Parties to the Convention, as foreseen in Article
22(c) of the Convention / $ 90.000

III. Emergency Assistance (Provision of experts, equipment or financial grants), as foreseen in Article 21.2 of the Convention / $150.000

IV. Programme Support

Technical review of nominations by ICOMOS

For 15 to 30 nominations $300 per nomination
(For up to 15 nominations $450 per nomination) / $9.000

Technical review of nominations by IUCN

For 15 to 30 nominations $300 per nomination
(for up to 15 nominations $450 per nomination) / $9.000

Public information activities / $30.000

// $ 48.000

V. Temporary Assistance for the Secretariat / $ 47.000

Total / $475.000
Contingency Funds (3% of $475.000) / $ 14.250

// $ 489.250

Nombre d'États parties présents et votants : 34

Nombre de bulletins valables :                                                                    34

Nombre de voix obtenues par les États ayant la majorité requise (18 voix) :

(a) Ecuador

Equipment to enable the authorities to ensure the integrity of tho natural environment of the Galapagos Islands through protective measures.

up to a maximum of $50,000

i) The Convention was now entering its operational phase particularly as regards technical co-operation, emergency assistance and the training of specialists, which implied a considerable increase in the workload of the Secretariat. An amount of approximately $210,000 had been spent by the Unesco Secretariat in 1979 under its Regular Budget for the management of the Convention.

ii) Funds actually obligated in 1979 under the World Heritage Fund for programme support were as follows:

ICOMOS $ 15,600
IUCN $ 6,000
Temporary assistance to the Secretariat $ 59,000
________

$ 80,600

iii) The representatives of ICOMOS and IUCN explained that they had received funds under a lump-sum arrangement depending on the number of nominations examined but that this approach did not enable the Organizations to assure proper processing of the files and their continuous participation in the management of the Convention. They indicated that the direct contributions of their organizations to the management of the Convention could be estimated at $30,000 and $12,500 respectively in 1979.

a) that it was not opportune at the present time to retain a fixed percentage such as 14%, as indicated in paragraph 26 of document CC-79/CONF.003/12, to cover direct management costs of the Convention;

b) to ask the Director-General of Unesco to make additional efforts to provide the Secretariat with an adequate permanent staff to enable it to meet the substantial increase in workload due to the fact that the Convention has now entered its operational phase. Until the Secretariat could be fully constituted and a sufficient number of Member States ratified the Convention, the Committee considered it necessary to continue to provide for temporary assistance for the Secretariat and decided to review this question at its next session;

c) that with respect to temporary assistance and the processing of files by the advisory organizations, only a limited number of files could be processed between two Committee sessions,and therefore no allocation per nomination file should be made.

d) to allocate the following funds for programme support for the implementation of the Convention:

- for the Secretariat: under temporary assistance. .. $ 70,000

of which $40,000 for two consultants each for 6 m/m, one consultant for the cultural part, and one consultant for the natural part, and $30,000 for two(part-time) secretaries-documentalists

for IUCN ..$ 12,000

of which $4,000 for evaluation of files based on approximately 20 files,

$2,500 for travel and per diem costs for participation in meetings of the Bureau,

$2,500 for promotion of the Convention and, if necessary, field visits,

$3,000 for professional experts in the evaluation of the nominations

for ICOMOS ..$ 30,000

of which $20,000 for a part-time co-ordinator to evaluate nominations based on approximately 80 files,

$10,000 for one third of a full-time secretary and miscellaneous secretariat expenditures.

//$112,000

BUDGET (October 1979 - December 1980)

Activities / Brought forward from 1978-1979 / Additional funds allocated / Total funds authorized for period October 78- December 80

I. Preparatory Assistance / $69,234 /$ 80,000 / $ 149,234 (30 m/m)

II. Technical Co-operation / -- / $165,400 / $ 165,400

III. Training / $4,700 / $ 200,000 / $ 204,700

IV. Emergency / $ 70,000 / $ 100,000 / $ 170,000

V. Promotional Activities / $ 500 / $ 36,400 / $ 36,900

VI. Programme Support

- ICOMOS } / $ -3,600 / $ 45,600 / $ 42,000 ($ 12,000 IUCN)
- IUCN }      /  (deficit) /               /              ($ 30,000 ICOMOS)

VII. Temporary Assistance to the Secretariat

                  /      --     / 70,000  / 70,000

                  //140,834 / 697,400 / 838,234

Contingencies: 3% of total funds authorized

1. Having examined Documents WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/3C and WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/INF.3C and WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/INF.3C.Add
2. Takes note with satisfaction of the Report of the Rapporteur of its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004).

1. Ayant examiné les documents WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/4B et WHC-04/7 EXT.COM/4B.Add,

2. Rappelant la décision 28 COM 13.1 adoptée à sa 28e session (Suzhou, 2004),

3. Décide que la réunion spéciale d’experts mentionnée au paragraphe 13 de la décision 28 COM 13.1 aura lieu à Kazan, comme l’a proposé la Fédération de Russie, et remercie les autorités russes de leur offre ;

4. Décide que la réunion spéciale susmentionnée se tiendra du 6 au 9 avril 2005 ;

5. Demande au Centre du patrimoine mondial de préparer un document de base présentant dans la mesure du possible des informations pertinentes sur les éléments mentionnés aux alinéas a), b), c), d) du paragraphe 13 de la décision 28 COM 13.1. Ce document doit être considéré comme le document de référence guidant le travail de la réunion spéciale d’experts et il devrait également être distribué à tous les membres du Comité pour information, accompagné d’une lettre circulaire ;

6. Demande aux Organisations consultatives de présenter à la réunion spéciale d’experts un document sur l’analyse des Listes indicatives et sur les études thématiques, comme précisé au paragraphe 12 de la décision susmentionnée, afin de disposer d’un état clair de la situation concernant la question des catégories sous-représentées et moins représentées des biens naturels et culturels sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial ;

7. Demande au Centre du patrimoine mondial de préparer, à partir des conclusions et des propositions de la réunion spéciale d’experts, un document pour considération par le Comité à sa 29e session (Durban, 2005).

 

10. L'Assemblée générale a ensuite pris note de l'état des comptes du Fonds du patrimoine mondial pour l'exercice financier qui s'était terminé le 31 décembre 1987, de l'état intérimaire des comptes de l'exercice financier 1988-1989 établi au 31 août 1989 et de l'état récapitulatif des contributions reçues des États parties à la date du 31 août 1989, présentés dans le document CC-89/CONF.013/2. Elle a également pris note des informations fournies par le Secrétariat sur les contributions reçues depuis le 31 août 1989.