https://whc.unesco.org?cid=305&l=fr&&year_end=2019&searchDecisions=&action=list&mode=rss Centre du patrimoine mondial - décision du Comité 90 fr Copyright 2023 UNESCO, World Heritage Centre Thu, 21 Sep 2023 19:06:16 EST https://whc.unesco.org/document/logowhc.jpg https://whc.unesco.org a estimé que des informations plus précises devraient être fournies sur le détail du projet, le réalisme des barèmes de salaires proposés et les chances de voir le projet se réaliser dans un proche avenir.]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/8027 wh-info@unesco.org Thu, 08 Jun 1978 00:00:00 EST The first session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as the "Committee") was held in Paris from 27 June to 1 July 1977 and was attended by representatives of the fifteen States members of the Committee.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2021 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST Representatives of the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property, the International Council of Monuments and Sites and the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (hereinafter referred to as the "Rome Centre", "ICOMOS" and "IUCN" respectively) attended the meeting in an advisory capacity. The discussions were also followed by representatives of two other States Parties to the Convention, of the United Nations and of a non-governmental organization.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2022 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST The full list of participants is to be found in Annex I to this report.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2023 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST After welcoming the representatives of States members of the Committee, the Director-General underlined the importance of the meeting for the pursuit of one of the fundamental objectives of the Organization - the promotion of the preservation and presentation of the cultural and natural heritage of mankind. He stressed the innovative character of the World Heritage Convention under which the Committee was established: for the first time, an international convention was concerned with both the cultural and the natural elements of the environment of man and, again for the first time, the international community as a whole was called upon to assume responsibility for protecting the cultural and natural heritage of outstanding universal value. He expressed the hope that action taken by the Committee would not induce States Parties to neglect that part of their heritage that would not be included in the World Heritage List. The Director-General also recalled the different tasks before the Committee, referring in particular to the establishment of the World Heritage List and the List of World Heritage in Danger and to the provision of international co-operation under the World Heritage Fund. Before concluding, he thanked the Rome Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN for their valuable assistance in preparing the documentation for the meeting and expressed his conviction that the same spirit of co-operation with these three organizations would continue to prevail.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2024 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST The Committee elected by acclamation Mr. Firouz Bagherzadeh (Iran) as its Chairman.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2025 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST A member of the Committee proposed that Rule 12 of the Provisional Rules of Procedure should be amended to provide for the election of four Vice-Chairmen. This proposal was supported by two members and adopted by the Committee. The Committee then proceeded to elect by acclamation the representatives of the Arab Republic of Egypt, France, Nigeria and Poland, as Vice-Chairmen, and Peter H. Bennett (Canada) as Rapporteur.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2026 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST The Chairman invited the members of the Committee to examine the Provisional Agenda prepared by the Secretariat. The representative of the Director-General proposed that an item on "other matters" be added to the Agenda; under this item would be considered the offer of collaboration from the International Organization for the Protection of Works of Art (document CC-77/CONF.OO1/5) and the proposed donation of Professor Badawy (document CC-77/CONF.OO1/7). He also suggested that the methods of work of the Committee should not be discussed separately but rather in conjunction with items 7 and 8 of the Provisional Agenda since these items were closely related.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2027 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST With the above modifications and on the above understanding, the Agenda was adopted.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2028 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST In reply to a suggestion that the Rules of Procedure should be examined by a working group which would report back to the Committee at a later plenary meeting, the Legal Adviser stated that, in the absence of a text formally approved by the Committee, the Provisional Rules of Procedure would prevail and he therefore proposed that they be examined at an early plenary meeting; this would not prevent the Committee from amending the Rules of procedure at a later stage, if necessary. He added that the Rules of Procedure would probably only assume their final form after two or three sessions of the Committee. After some discussion, the Committee decided to examine the Rules of Procedure one by one.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2029 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST Several amendments were proposed to bring greater clarity to the text or to reflect more closely the terms of the Convention. The Rules relating to the election of officers and to the voting procedures gave rise to some comment.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2030 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST With respect to the eligibility for re-election of members of the Bureau, participants considered that, although rotation in the membership of the Bureau was necessary, continuity in the work of the Committee was of paramount importance. Various proposals followed, some providing for re-election of all officers and others for re-election of the Vice-Chairmen and the Rapporteur only. A further proposal which sought to limit the eligibility of all officers for immediate re-election to a second term of office was finally accepted.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2031 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST An explanation was requested on the different weightings required for a majority vote under the terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Rule 28. The Legal Adviser referred members to paragraph 8 of Article 13 of the Convention·which stipulated that "Decisions of the Committee shall be taken by a majority of two-thirds of its members present and voting". This provision was included in an Article of the Convention dealing with substantive questions and not with procedural matters. It was therefore considered that a two-thirds majority should be required on substantive questions. However, according to the terms of paragraph 4 of this Rule, it would be the Committee which would decide, by a simple majority, whether the question to be put to the vote would or would not require a two-thirds majority.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2032 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST Participants requested that two points raised in connection with the Rules of Procedure be noted in the summary record. The first related to the meetings of the Committee which, in the opinion of one member, should be given wide publicity. The second concerned the suspension of the Rules of Procedure which, as confirmed by the Legal Adviser, could be initiated by any State member of the Committee.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2033 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST A corrigendum setting cut the modifications made by the Committee, as well as an amendment proposed by the representative of the Director-General to Rule 8.2, was examined at the last meeting of the Committee which then proceeded to adopt unanimously the revised text of its Rules of Procedure. (Annex II)

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2034 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST The Chairman invited the members of the Committee to consider the main working document and gave the floor to the representative of the Director-General who introduced the document which had been prepared with the assistance of the Rome Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2035 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST Some discussion ensued on the method to be followed in examining the different points raised in the document and it was decided to establish two working groups with which the Rome Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN would be associated and which would review the proposed criteria for the inclusion of cultural and natural properties in the World Heritage List, and drafting group which would formulate the decisions taken by the Committee on other matters. The Committee proceeded to debate the general principles involved in establishing the World Heritage List and to examine, one by one, the other questions raised in the document.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2036 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST It was the opinion of several members that the Committee should issue a statement on the whole philosophy underlying the Convention and, in particular, the need for a World Heritage List. Others felt that the discussion on the criteria for inclusion of properties in the List would necessarily raise the philosophical concepts involved.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2037 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST Several members felt strongly that the World Heritage List should be exclusive and that, because of its impact, the List - in which balance would be sought geographically and between cultural and natural properties - should be drawn up with extreme care. Responsibility for ensuring the exclusive character of the List would rest first of all, with the States nominating properties and secondly, with the Committee which would have the right to reject nominations; the adoption of criteria which would be used by the Committee to filter nominations therefore constituted a very important first step.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2038 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST The feasibility of adopting criteria gave rise to some discussion, with member's referring to the difficulty already experienced in establishing criteria at the national level, to the changing and subjective nature of evaluations of qualities, to the impact of Western thought and to the difference between perception from within a given culture and perception from outside. The representative of ICOMOS, in reply, recognized the difficulty of drafting criteria to be applied to cultural property throughout the world and of translating concepts into words that were meaningful on a universal scale; an attempt had been made but he realized that, in the light of experience as nominations were examined, the criteria would probably require some adjustment.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2039 wh-info@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST