Patrimoine mondial https://whc.unesco.org?cid=305&l=fr&&year_end=1993&searchDecisions=&action=list&mode=rss Centre du patrimoine mondial - décision du Comité 90 fr Copyright 2024 UNESCO, World Heritage Centre Mon, 20 May 2024 23:14:48 EST UNESCO, World Heritage Centre - Decisions https://whc.unesco.org/document/logowhc.jpg https://whc.unesco.org 1 BUR VI.ii.26 Demandes d'assistance technique - Demande de l'Ethiopie concernant le Parc du Simien a estimé que des informations plus précises devraient être fournies sur le détail du projet, le réalisme des barèmes de salaires proposés et les chances de voir le projet se réaliser dans un proche avenir.]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/8027 wh-support@unesco.org Thu, 08 Jun 1978 00:00:00 EST 1 COM III.5 Élection du Bureau https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2025 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM III.6 Élection du Bureau qui a été adoptée. Le Comité a ensuite élu par acclamation les représentants de la République arabe d'Egypte, de la France, du Nigéria et de la Pologne comme vice-présidents et M. Peter H. Bennett (Canada) comme rapporteur.]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2026 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM IV.7-8 Adoption de l'ordre du jour
8. Compte tenu des changements et des indications ci-dessus, l'ordre du jour a été adopté.]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2027 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.9 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure In reply to a suggestion that the Rules of Procedure should be examined by a working group which would report back to the Committee at a later plenary meeting, the Legal Adviser stated that, in the absence of a text formally approved by the Committee, the Provisional Rules of Procedure would prevail and he therefore proposed that they be examined at an early plenary meeting; this would not prevent the Committee from amending the Rules of procedure at a later stage, if necessary. He added that the Rules of Procedure would probably only assume their final form after two or three sessions of the Committee. After some discussion, the Committee decided to examine the Rules of Procedure one by one.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2029 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.10 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure Several amendments were proposed to bring greater clarity to the text or to reflect more closely the terms of the Convention. The Rules relating to the election of officers and to the voting procedures gave rise to some comment.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2030 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.11 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure With respect to the eligibility for re-election of members of the Bureau, participants considered that, although rotation in the membership of the Bureau was necessary, continuity in the work of the Committee was of paramount importance. Various proposals followed, some providing for re-election of all officers and others for re-election of the Vice-Chairmen and the Rapporteur only. A further proposal which sought to limit the eligibility of all officers for immediate re-election to a second term of office was finally accepted.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2031 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.12 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure An explanation was requested on the different weightings required for a majority vote under the terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of Rule 28. The Legal Adviser referred members to paragraph 8 of Article 13 of the Convention·which stipulated that "Decisions of the Committee shall be taken by a majority of two-thirds of its members present and voting". This provision was included in an Article of the Convention dealing with substantive questions and not with procedural matters. It was therefore considered that a two-thirds majority should be required on substantive questions. However, according to the terms of paragraph 4 of this Rule, it would be the Committee which would decide, by a simple majority, whether the question to be put to the vote would or would not require a two-thirds majority.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2032 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.13 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure Participants requested that two points raised in connection with the Rules of Procedure be noted in the summary record. The first related to the meetings of the Committee which, in the opinion of one member, should be given wide publicity. The second concerned the suspension of the Rules of Procedure which, as confirmed by the Legal Adviser, could be initiated by any State member of the Committee.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2033 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM V.14 [Uniquement en anglais] Adoption of the rules of procedure A corrigendum setting cut the modifications made by the Committee, as well as an amendment proposed by the representative of the Director-General to Rule 8.2, was examined at the last meeting of the Committee which then proceeded to adopt unanimously the revised text of its Rules of Procedure. (Annex II)

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2034 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.15 [Uniquement en anglais] Consideration of main working document (CC-77/CONF.001/4) The Chairman invited the members of the Committee to consider the main working document and gave the floor to the representative of the Director-General who introduced the document which had been prepared with the assistance of the Rome Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2035 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.16 [Uniquement en anglais] Consideration of main working document (CC-77/CONF.001/4) Some discussion ensued on the method to be followed in examining the different points raised in the document and it was decided to establish two working groups with which the Rome Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN would be associated and which would review the proposed criteria for the inclusion of cultural and natural properties in the World Heritage List, and drafting group which would formulate the decisions taken by the Committee on other matters. The Committee proceeded to debate the general principles involved in establishing the World Heritage List and to examine, one by one, the other questions raised in the document.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2036 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.A(a).17 Etablissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial - Débat général https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2037 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM VI.A(a).18 Établissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2038 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM VI.A(a).19 Établissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2039 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM VI.A(a).20 Établissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2040 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST 1 COM VI.A(a).21 [Uniquement en anglais] Establishment of the World Heritage List Questions were raised with respect to the calendar for the submission of nominations to be examined at the second session of the Committee. Many members mentioned difficulties for their own national authorities in meeting the deadline of 1 April 1978, particularly in those countries where complete inventories had not yet been established. Several members strongly urged that technical co-operation should be financed under the Fund for the preparation of these inventories. The representative of the Director-General referred participants in this respect to the Convention which explicitly provides that requests for international assistance might also be concerned with identification of cultural or natural property "when preliminary investigations have shown that further inquiries would be justified" (Article 13 (2)). He added that it was not necessary to submit complete inventories by 1 April 1978 and that other nominations could be put forward to later sessions of the Committee.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2041 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.A(a).22 [Uniquement en anglais] Establishment of the World Heritage List Several members considered that an independent assessment by experts of the nominations submitted would be essential and it was proposed that the nominations should be transmitted, for comments and evaluation, to the Rome Centre, ICOMOS or IUCN, as appropriate.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2043 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.A(a).23 [Uniquement en anglais] Establishment of the World Heritage List One member considered that States not Parties to the Convention should be able to have properties nominated by a State Party for inclusion in the List. Other participants inquired about the possibility of nominating properties not situated in national territories, such as international sites, for instance the United Nations building in New York, or regions such as Antarctica. However, it was pointed out that the Convention was very explicit in this respect, Article II referring to the submission by each State Party of inventories of properties situated in its territory.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2042 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST
1 COM VI.A(a).24 [Uniquement en anglais] Establishment of the World Heritage List The Committee then proceeded to examine the working document paragraph by paragraph and to put forward their comments which would be taken into account by the drafting committee in formulating the decisions taken by the Committee.

]]>
https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2044 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 27 Jun 1977 00:00:00 EST