Patrimoine mondial https://whc.unesco.org?cid=305&l=fr&&searchDecisions=&year_start=1981&year_end=1981&action=list&mode=rss Centre du patrimoine mondial - décision du Comité 90 fr Copyright 2024 UNESCO, World Heritage Centre Mon, 27 May 2024 01:31:30 EST UNESCO, World Heritage Centre - Decisions https://whc.unesco.org/document/logowhc.jpg https://whc.unesco.org 1 EXT.COM III.5 Élection de deux Vice-Présidents a élu par acclamation la Bulgarie et le Sénégal comme Vice-Présidents.]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/8039 wh-support@unesco.org Thu, 10 Sep 1981 00:00:00 EST 1 EXT.COM IV.11/14 Proposition d'inscription de la Vieille Ville de Jérusalem et de ses remparts sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial
11. Le Comité a enregistré cette confirmation et a été d'accord que la "Vieille Ville de Jérusalem et ses remparts" constituent un ensemble historique qui doit être considéré dans sa globalité comme un tout cohérent dont l'équilibre et le caractère spécifique dépendent de la synthèse des éléments qui le composent, et où la préservation devrait se faire en prenant en considération les manifestations des différentes périodes historiques.

14. Le Comité a décidé d'inscrire la "Vieille Ville de Jérusalem et ses remparts" sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial.]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/8040 wh-support@unesco.org Thu, 10 Sep 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 BUR III..14.A [Uniquement en anglais] Requests for technical co-operation - Technical co-operation projects recommended for approval 14. The Bureau examined the deferred and new requests received from the States Parties to the Convention and made the following recommendations to the Committee.

A. Technical Co-operation requests projects recommended for approval

- Malta - Hal Saflieni Hypogeum (request n°130.1)

The Bureau recommended that the Committee grant technical co-operation consisting of equipment and one month's consultant mission for a total amount of $9,000 to help with the preservation of the Hal Saflieni Hypogeum.

- Malta - Ggantija and Valetta (request n°131.1/132.1)

The Bureau recommended that the Committee grant technical co-operation consisting of a two-week consultant mission to advise on setting up a stone research and conservation unit necessary for the preservation of Ggantija and Valletta, at a cost of $3,250.

- Poland - Cracow's Historic Centre (request n°29.1)

The Bureau recommended that technical co-operation in the form of equipment, the cost of which amounts to $75,500, be granted to Poland for the safeguarding of Cracow's Historic Centre.

- Syrian Arab Republic - City of Damascus (request n°20.1 revised)

The Bureau recommended that the Committee grant technical co-operation amounting to $120,000 in the form of equipment and financial assistance for conservation work in the City of Damascus.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2791 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 04 May 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 BUR III..B Demandes d'assistance internationale B. Technical cooperation requests deferred

- Algeria - The Qal'ah of Beni Hammad (request n°102.1)

The Algerian authorities had submitted a request for assistance in connection with the preservation of the above site. The Bureau was informed that a preparatory assistance consultant mission would take place in July 1981 in order to prepare a revised, detailed request for technical co-operation for this site, which will be submitted to the Bureau at its 6th session.

- Algeria - Dey's Palace and Citadel Quarter of Setif (requests n°101.1 and 103.1)

These requests had to be deferred until a decision as to the inscription of these sites on the World Heritage List was reached.

- Ethiopia - Abiyata-Shala and Bale Mountain (requests n°111.1/112.1)

The Bureau deferred these requests for technical co-operation as both properties were not yet legally protected and thus did not qualify yet for inscription in the World Heritage List.

- Syrian Arab Republic - Bosra, Palmyra (requests n°22.1/23.1)

The Syrian government had requested equipment in connection with conservation work at these sites. The Bureau deferred these requests as further clarifications was necessary.

- Syrian Arab Republic - Aleppo (request n°21.1)

This request had to be deferred until a decision as to the inscription of the site on the World Heritage List was reached.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2802 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 04 May 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 BUR III..C [Uniquement en anglais] Other technical co-operation requests Guinea - Mount Nimba (request n°155.1)

The Guinean authorities had requested equipment amounting to $48.510 for a scientific research programme for Mount Nimba. However, the Bureau felt that priority should be given to protective measures and to the establishment of a management plan for this site. The Bureau therefore encouraged Guinea to re-formulate and to re-submit a request along these lines.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2803 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 04 May 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 BUR IV..16.a [Uniquement en anglais] Requests for emergency assistance 16. The Bureau granted emergency assistance to

(a) Pakistan: Salaries for workmen and purchase of equipment for emergency restoration work at Lahore Fort and Shalimar Gardens at the cost of $44,000 and $12,000 respectively.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2804 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 04 May 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 BUR IV..C.b [Uniquement en anglais] Requests for emergency assistance 16. The Bureau granted emergency assistance to:

(b) Tunisia: Contribution of $95,000 for emergency restoration work at the Dar Haddad Palace in the Medina of Tunis.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/2806 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 04 May 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM I.1 Introduction La cinquième session du Comité du patrimoine mondial s'est tenue à Sydney, Australie du 26 au 30 octobre 1981, à l'aimable invitation du gouvernement australien.  Les États membres du Comité dont la liste suit étaient présents à la réunion: République fédérale d'Allemagne, Argentine, Australie, Brésil,  Bulgarie, Chypre, Egypte, États-Unis d'Amérique, France, Guinée, Irak, Italie, Jordanie, Jamahiriya arabe libyenne, Népal  Pakistan, Suisse et Tunisie.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5225 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM I.2 [Uniquement en anglais] Introduction Representatives of the International Centre for Conservation in Rome (ICCROM), the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), and the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) attended the meeting in an advisory capacity.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5226 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM I.3 Introduction Observers from seven States Parties to the Convention not members of the Committee, namely Canada, Chile, India, Iran, Malta, Poland and Portugal also participated in the session, as well as observers from one intergovernmental organization, the Arab Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organisation (ALECSO) and two international non-governmental organizations, the International Council of Museums (ICOM); and the International Federation of Landscape Architects (IFLA). The full list of participants will be found in Annex I to this report

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5227 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM II.4 Séance d'ouverture The meeting was formally opened by the Prime Minister of Australia, The Rt. Hon. Malcolm Fraser, who welcomed delegates and observers to his country. The Prime Minister referred to the concept of a World Heritage as a profound expression of co-operation between people and a willingness to share, and stated that the World Heritage Convention was an important milestone in the modern history of man's concern, not only for his environment, but also for his cultural roots and origins. The Prime Minister also spoke of the first nominations by Australia for the World Heritage List and of the environmental and conservation concerns of the Australian authorities. The Prime Minister concluded by referring to the challenging task of the Committee in trying to ensure that univers- ally valuable sites and properties from all countries could find a secure place on the World Heritage List.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5228 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM II.5 Séance d'ouverture  In reply, the representative of the Director-General of Unesco, Mr. G. Bolla, thanked the Prime Minister for his welcome and expressed the profound gratitude of the participants for the kind invitation to hold the meeting in Sydney and for the generous hospitality of the Australian people. He also recalled the concern of Mr. Amadou Mahtar M'Bow, Director- General of Unesco, for the conservation of the cultural and the natural heritage and expressed the Director-General's appreciation for the active participation of Australia in all the activities of Unesco.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5229 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM III.6 Élection du Président Professor R. O. Slatyer (Australia) was elected Chairman of the Committee by acclamation and he delivered a brief address.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5230 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM IV.7-9 Adoption de l'ordre du jour 7. The Committee adopted the agenda for the session.

8. A delegate suggested that two working groups be set up in order to examine a number of questions of principle relating to the implementation of the Convention, and, in particular, the procedures for the evaluation of nominated properties and the way to strike a better balance between the cultural heritage and the natural heritage.

9. The Chairman suggested that this proposal be examined by the Bureau as soon as it was established. It was subsequently decided to set up two working groups, one to study the procedure for the evaluation and examination of nominations to the World Heritage List as well as the question of protecting world heritage properties and another to examine technical co-operation requests and to propose a budget for the forthcoming year.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5231 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM IX.17 [Uniquement en anglais] Proposed modification of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee At its fourth session (Paris, 1-5 September 1980), the Committee elected five Vice-Chairmen including the representatives of Ghana and Yugoslavia. However, at the Third General Assembly of States Parties to the World Heritage Convention, which met in Belgrade on 7 October 1980, Ghana and Yugoslavia, whose term of office was due to expire at the end of the 21st session of the General Conference, were not candidates for re-election to the Committee and thus ceased to be members. Therefore, in accordance with Rule 12.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee, these two Vice-Chairmen could no longer remain in office after the end of the 21st session of the General Conference. In consequence, at the fifth session of the Bureau (Paris, May 4-7 1981) the members of the Bureau were reduced in number.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5238 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM IX.18 [Uniquement en anglais] Proposed modification of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee To avoid a repetition of this situation a number of proposals were put forward, in particular to amend the Rules of Procedure of the Committee. At the end of the debate, the Committee was of the opinion that Rule 12.1 of the Rules of Procedure should not be amended. It decided that henceforth, in the year when the General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention is held, the ordinary session of the Committee should be held as soon as possible after the meeting of this Assembly.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5239 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM V.10 [Uniquement en anglais] Election of Vice-Chairman and Rapporteur The Committee thereafter elected by acclamation the delegates of the following States members of the Committee as Vice-Chairmen: the Federal Republic of Germany, Brazil, Bulgaria, Guinea and Nepal. Mr Azedine Beschaouch (Tunisia) was re-elected Rapporteur by acclamation.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5232 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM VI.11 Rapport de la 5e session du Bureau du Comité du patrimoine mondial The Rapporteur, Mr A. Beschaouch, referred to the main points of the report on the fifth session of the Bureau of the Committee, held in Paris from 4 to 7 May 1981. In particular, he draw attention to the twenty-seven properties recommended for inclusion in the World Heritage List.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5233 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM VII.13-14 Propositions d'inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial 13. The Committee examined one by one the nominations of those properties which the Bureau had recommended for inclusion on the World Heritage List. In each case, the Committee took note of the comments of the representatives of ICOMOS and/or IUCN, who had made an evaluation of each property in relation to the criteria for inscription. The Committee also noted, for each case, the point of view of the Bureau as presented by the Rapporteur.

14. The Chairman informed the Committee that he had received a letter from an Australian non-governmental organization asking to address the Committee on one nomination and to provide material to the Committee concerning the Australian site in question. On the recommendation of the Bureau, the Committee decided that such groups would not be authorized to address the Committee direct nor to circulate material in the meeting room and that they should be requested to contact their national delegations.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5234 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST 5 COM VII.12 Rapport du représentant du Directeur-general  In reporting on the activities undertaken during the last twelve months relating to the implementation of the Convention, the representative of the Director-General informed the Committee that a total of sixty-one States had now adhered to the Convention. There were however some regions in which only a few countries had ratified the Convention and the Secretariat assured the Committee that it would do its utmost to urge other countries to participate in this activity. Eighty-six sites, proposed by twenty-nine countries, had already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, but there were twenty-four States Parties which had so far not submitted any nomination to the List. He also reported on the activities undertaken in implementation of the decisions taken by the Committee at its fourth session and on the financial situation of the World Heritage Fund which could be considered satisfactory. He indicated, in particular, that as at 31 August 1981, the cash in hand amounted to $1,907,600.75.

]]> https://whc.unesco.org/fr/decisions/5235 wh-support@unesco.org Mon, 26 Oct 1981 00:00:00 EST